Would the documentation make more sense in the repo-wide README? That one is more about features and layout, while the one in documentation is focused more on installation.
It's true that the NAVXs are on /dev/ttyACM right now, but it's better practice to use the /dev/imu paths to refer to them instead, in case we find a better way to distinguish them in the future or in case we introduce something else that uses /dev/ttyACM* paths. See src/rovr_common/scripts/10-rovr19.rules for our current udev rules.
Would the documentation make more sense in the repo-wide README? That one is more about features and layout, while the one in documentation is focused more on installation.
It's true that the NAVXs are on /dev/ttyACM right now, but it's better practice to use the /dev/imu paths to refer to them instead, in case we find a better way to distinguish them in the future or in case we introduce something else that uses /dev/ttyACM* paths. See src/rovr_common/scripts/10-rovr19.rules for our current udev rules.