Closed naik-aakash closed 1 month ago
We have decided to resolve this issue by deleting the paragraph at line number 74. While this is a known phenomena in the field, once getting into the literature it was clear there isn't a neat way of doing this well within the limited space of the article.
@naik-aakash Hello! All these tasks are completed. Additional information on each task is provided on an issue created for the JOSS review, which is Issue https://github.com/GOMC-WSU/MoSDeF-dihedral-fit/issues/101
https://github.com/GOMC-WSU/GOMC_Examples/tree/main/MoSDeF-dihedral-fit
@naik-aakash
A new mosdef-dihedral-fit version 0.1.0 was released on GitHub and conda-forge, which contains all the review requests. Additionally, new examples are listed on the README file and are posted here
Thanks @bc118 will try to have a look asap in next days 😄
Ok, thanks! 🙏
@naik-aakash Please be aware of this minor change which we would like to fix for the paper, which will be reflected in the MoSDeF-dihedral-fit version 0.1.1. This was an oversight in the equally contributing tag in the authorship. https://github.com/GOMC-WSU/MoSDeF-dihedral-fit/pull/131
The person who had the equally contributing tag n the authorship removed is the one who submitted it, and I believe he will bring it up with the editor also, and is agreement with this change.
There is no change to the code.
Part of JOSS review : https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6970
Dear developers,
I was reading through the paper submitted on the JOSS. There was this particular line that got me wondering if there are any previous studies that highlights this specific issue mentioned?
Due to these limitations, scientists assumed that the dihedral fits were transferable with all the atom classes in the dihedral fit; however, this is not always an accurate assumption. Some of the dihedrals were only fit to the first minimum and not the entire dihedral landscape, which can lead to errors in the predicted molecular conformations.