Closed tsteven4 closed 9 months ago
any reason not to do these as well?
typedef unsigned char UC;
typedef uint16_t US;
If it's easy, go for it's please.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023, 9:13 AM tsteven4 @.***> wrote:
any reason not to do these as well?
typedef unsigned char UC; typedef uint16_t US;
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GPSBabel/gpsbabel/pull/1217#issuecomment-1810426337, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCSD33G2QXKSSLQM544ZWTYEODBDAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7K6PFX6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMJQGQZDMMZTG4 . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
It is quite easy to do an "inline" refactoring of a typedef like these. However, the refactoring isn't offered for the equivalent using statement.
In any event I am going to postpone inlining of UC and US to finish some other work.
thanks resharper, it just took a little preparation and help with non-widows code.