Closed michaelchin closed 1 week ago
I think I've found the issue - I'll write more up later tonight (or tomorrow).
I think the MOR is not being detected as a spreading feature (at this point in the code, called from here).
I had a look at the MOR feature in the above example (specifically South Atlantic MOR topology 114-85 Ma
) and I think it's an issue with that feature not having a gpml:reconstructionMethod property to indicate that it's an MOR (only having a left and right plate ID is not quite sufficient). So instead the code is looking for a plate/conjugate ID pair and not finding them, and hence ignoring the MOR (when generating seed points along the ridge).
I can see why this is happening to MORs that are topological lines. An MOR that is a topological line doesn't need these properties to determine its motion (like a non-topological line does) since its motion is determined exclusively by the independently moving points it's topologically connected to. However for age grids, these properties are needed to move the age-gridding seed points (which start out along the MOR).
So, adding the following properties to that feature (eg, using GPlates) should hopefully fix that:
gpml:reconstructionMethod
property with a value of HalfStageRotationVersion3
.
gpml:geometryImportTime
property with the time at which spreading starts (eg, time of appearance of MOR).
Waiting for customer's feedback on John's solution. Add label 'pending'. Pending on customer's feedback.
John, this works great, thanks - exactly the missing piece that was needed. This issue can now be closed.
The info below was provided by Sabin.
Maybe it’s something I’m doing wrong here, but the gplately method for age-gridding seems to be breaking down entirely if the topology section is a topological line. The South Atlantic is essentially broken in this model from the beginning.
https://filesender.aarnet.edu.au/?s=download&token=90fe2b27-ae83-474c-b621-8e782639ede3
Each point is tagged as a MidOceanicRidge, and the topological line itself is tagged correctly too. So I’m not sure what’s going on. I then added gpml:leftPlate and gpml:rightPlate to the topological line, in the hope it will fix the problem. But no luck.
Ben, maybe you have an insight into a basic aspect, which is, does the workflow deal with topological lines (MORs) at all? If not, it would need to be added as a very high priority – but perhaps there’s something I’m missing???