In order to understand what information harvester 2.0 is responsible for processing, datagov wants to define the supported spatial metadata standards of harvester 2.0
Acceptance Criteria
[ACs should be clearly demoable/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]
[ ] GIVEN what spatial metadata standards are currently in catalog \
AND what the current harvester supports
WHEN a discussion happens \
THEN a list of supported metadata types is produced \
Background
What spatial metadata standards are currently supported in harvester 1.0?
ISO 19115 Metadata ( ISO 19139 NGDC XSD )
FGDC minimal validation
FGDC CSDGM Version 2.0, 1998 ( FGDC-STD-001-1998)
FGDC CSDGM Biological Data Profile (FGDC-STD-001.1-1999)
FGDC CSDGM Metadata Profile for Shoreline Data (FGDC-STD-001.2-2001)
FGDC Extension for Remote Sensing (FGDC-STD-012-2002)
What spatial metadata standards are in catalog?
ISO19115-2 (291017 datasets)
FGDC-STD-001-1998 (5262 datasets)
ISO19139 (2219 datasets)
What spatial services do we NOT want to support in harvester 2.0? ( not a metadata standard but relevant )
CSW
geoportal
ArcGIS
What could a transformation pipeline look like for harvester 2.0 with the data we currently have?
ISO19115-2 ---------\
FGDC-STD-001-1998 ---[ ISO19139 NGDC we're here currently on catalog ] --- [ ISO19115-3 --- DCATUS this is h2.0 ]
noaa takeaway: do we want to support s3 as a harvest source? s3 bucket urls can't be authenticated. waf will have a .gov TLD so that's why we can process them
User Story
In order to understand what information harvester 2.0 is responsible for processing, datagov wants to define the supported spatial metadata standards of harvester 2.0
Acceptance Criteria
[ACs should be clearly demoable/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]
Background
What spatial metadata standards are currently supported in harvester 1.0?
What spatial metadata standards are in catalog?
What spatial services do we NOT want to support in harvester 2.0? ( not a metadata standard but relevant )
What could a transformation pipeline look like for harvester 2.0 with the data we currently have?
Security Considerations (required)
[Any security concerns that might be implicated in the change. "None" is OK, just be explicit here!]
Sketch
[Notes or a checklist reflecting our understanding of the selected approach]