GSA / fedramp-automation

FedRAMP Automation
https://www.fedramp.gov/using-the-fedramp-oscal-resources-and-templates/
Other
255 stars 74 forks source link

Clarification on <back-matter> resource linkage to controls #218

Closed telosBA closed 2 years ago

telosBA commented 2 years ago

NOTE: For feedback related to the OSCAL syntax itself, please create or add to an issue in the NIST OSCAL Repository.

1.0.2

In the FedRAMP SSP example, the artifacts (<back-matter> resources) are only tied to certain controls. What is the requirement / limitation of linking artifacts – since Xacta will be leveraging local types. What resource types are required for validation?

volpet2014 commented 2 years ago

We currently look for specific resource types. See https://github.com/GSA/fedramp-automation/blob/master/dist/content/resources/xml/fedramp_values.xml for a list. FedRAMP may consider allowing additional types in a future update if this becomes an issue for other tool implementers.

telosBA commented 2 years ago

We currently look for specific resource types. See https://github.com/GSA/fedramp-automation/blob/master/dist/content/resources/xml/fedramp_values.xml for a list. FedRAMP may consider allowing additional types in a future update if this becomes an issue for other tool implementers.

@volpet2014 Will FedRAMP specify what values must be present for validation in the future?

volpet2014 commented 2 years ago

Just started working through issue with NIST see "FedRAMP Profiles Uses Vendored Media Types Not Conformant with OSCAL & IANA Media Type Specification #232".