Open dimitri-zhurkin-vitg opened 10 months ago
This is a ...
This relates to ...
NOTE: For feedback related to the OSCAL syntax itself, please create or add to an issue in the NIST OSCAL Repository.
Where, exactly?
What is your feedback?
In the rev 5 SSP Guide, in section 6.3 Implementation Status (page 52), under Implementation Status Representation
<remarks>
<prop>
alternative
<!-- system-implementation --> <control-implementation> <implemented-requirement uuid="uuid-value" control-id="ac-1"> <prop name="planned-completion-date" ns="https://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal" value="2021-01-01Z"/> <prop name="implementation-status" ns="https://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal" value="implemented"/> <prop name="implementation-status" ns="https://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal" value="partial"> <remarks>Describe the reason for this status.</remarks> </prop> <prop name="implementation-status" ns="https://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal" value="planned"> <remarks>Describe the reason for this status.</remarks> </prop> <prop name="implementation-status" ns="https://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal" value="alternative"> <remarks>Describe the reason for this status.</remarks> </prop> <prop name="implementation-status" ns="https://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal" value="not-applicable"> <remarks>Describe the reason for this status.</remarks> </prop> <!-- responsible-role, statement, by-component --> </implemented-requirement> </control-implementation> <!-- back-matter -->
Is this report specifically related to the Word or Excel files from fedramp.gov? If so, please do not open an issue here. Follow the guidance in this repository's README and contact info@fedramp..gov.
What version of OSCAL are you using? (Check our info on supported OSCAL versions)
What action would you like to see from the FedRAMP PMO?
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. slack, gitter, etc)
This is a ...
This relates to ...
NOTE: For feedback related to the OSCAL syntax itself, please create or add to an issue in the NIST OSCAL Repository.
Where, exactly?
What is your feedback?
In the rev 5 SSP Guide, in section 6.3 Implementation Status (page 52), under Implementation Status Representation
<remarks>
child nodes to relevant<prop>
elements.alternative
prop.Is this report specifically related to the Word or Excel files from fedramp.gov? If so, please do not open an issue here. Follow the guidance in this repository's README and contact info@fedramp..gov.
What version of OSCAL are you using? (Check our info on supported OSCAL versions)
What action would you like to see from the FedRAMP PMO?
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. slack, gitter, etc)