GSA / innovation.gov

Deprecated - This project repo is no longer being maintained.
https://innovation.gov
14 stars 14 forks source link

Hiring a Chief Innovation Officer (has table) #27

Closed ccohan closed 6 years ago

ccohan commented 7 years ago

Hiring a Chief Innovation Officer

"People often feel that they are in a box where the lid is closing. It is hard to execute on ideas in a hierarchical system full of red tape." -Bryan Sivak, former Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at Health and Human Services (HHS)

Summary

Purpose & Outcomes

Purpose: Federal agencies can substantially benefit from having a Chief Innovation Officer (CINO) to serve as a catalyst for change to confront emerging challenges or improve the efficiency of decades-old service delivery processes.

A CINO serves as a beacon for innovation, working to harness, foster, execute, and manage innovative ideas. CINOs are force multipliers: these innovators teach and enable others, and spotlight staff doing or wanting to do innovative work. The role is also inherently flexible and sometimes includes ambiguous boundaries. A CINO’s portfolio may be defined around an agency’s priority needs. In broad terms, CINOs:

CINOs can be valuable assets for working to make an agency’s priorities real, from leading agency-wide initiatives, addressing employee engagement and culture change, tapping employee ideas in innovative ways, and sometimes leading efforts to change core underlying processes and improve performance and efficiency.

Appointing a CINO can result in persistent, high-value benefits for agency leadership because the CINO’s top priority is to focus on innovation and relentlessly drive it forward. These efforts can amplify any senior leadership’s capacity for attaining an agency’s mission. In times of tight budgets, CINOs act as change agents to transform an agency’s operations.

Examples

Approach

There is no single definition for CINO roles; senior leaders have created and defined this role in the ways that best address their agency’s needs.

In all cases, agencies must have a clear understanding of a CINO’s mission, role, and authority within an agency, in order to attract the most qualified candidates and to enable them to succeed. Sometimes it may be more appropriate to promote operational innovation by designating an innovation “home” in key functional roles such as human resources (HR), legal, and acquisition.

In other contexts where the top priorities involve technology integration and deployment, a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) may also be a suitable leadership home for an innovation portfolio. Some agencies designate their Chief Information Officer (CIO) as the lead for identifying and implementing innovative activities.

For CINOs or any leader tasked with overseeing innovation, the position must have clear authority and direction to fully realize their potential impact.

Actions and Considerations

Federal agencies may wish to consider the following when establishing a CINO position:

Defining the CINO’s role is critical. Once it is defined, an agency can better determine the job description, and which characteristics are most important in hiring candidates.

This checklist helps define the CINO’s role:

Under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA), personnel from other federal agencies, state and local governments, colleges and universities, Indian tribal governments, federally funded research and development centers (e.g., national laboratories), and other eligible organizations can be recruited to serve in a temporary position. The initial term can be up to two years, but it can be extended for another two years. The assignment may be reimbursable (e.g., the host agency reimburses all salary costs, travel, and administrative costs) or non-reimbursable.

IPA is a powerful but commonly misunderstood policy. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) encourages agencies to re-think the following IPA myths and misconceptions:

Myths Truth
IPAs are a popular and widely used flexibility. Agencies do not take full advantage of the IPA program that, if used strategically, can help agencies meet their needs for hard-to-fill positions such as information technology and nurses.
IPAs are cumbersome to use and require OPM approval. Agencies do not need OPM approval to make assignments under the IPA authority. Federal agencies interested in using the authority simply enter into a written agreement.
IPAs are expensive to use. Agencies may enter into IPA assignments on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis. This means they may be cost-neutral to federal agencies. Whether an IPA assignment is reimbursable is determined by the agency and non-federal entity involved in the assignment.
An agency may only enter into an IPA agreement with a state government entity. An agency may enter into an IPA agreement with state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and Indian tribal governments.
Agencies receive no recruitment benefit from sending employees on IPA assignments. Federal employees serving in IPA assignments can serve as both recruiters and ambassadors for positions in your agency. For example, federal nurses sent to colleges and universities as teachers/instructors can inspire students about federal employment and encourage them to consider employment with your agency via the Pathways Program. This results in a win-win for the academic institution as well as your agency.
An agency may document IPA assignments for full-time employment only. An agency may document IPA assignments for intermittent, part-time, and full-time employment.

Policies