Open vickimcfadden opened 6 months ago
@ekidenda @PowderD do y'all want to populate the user story here? The format is linked in the card, as a [some type of user], i need [to understand / do something], so that [I have some outcome]!
Decisions:
@mark-meyer One content change (and @rosamundtgov I updated in the content doc); we want to make the header row "OASIS legacy" instead of just "OASIS"
Other than that it's ready from my side.
Hi @ekidenda — this is merged in now and ready for review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/about/oasis-plus-comparison/
@mark-meyer and @rosamundtgov - Noticed the reference to 'family of contracts' applied to OASIS rather than OASIS+ as consistent with language in other parts of the webpage. I suggested a minor revision of the first sentence accordingly on the content doc. Thanks.
Updated in the copy doc and in Github
@mark-meyer: https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/pull/181
@ekidenda ready for your review
This page generally looks good, but when reading it, seems as though the section under the header: "OASIS+ will continues to:" represents 'similarities' between the contracts. In reading further, the table presents both similarities and differences in a random manner and it is confusing / difficult to follow. Perhaps one option could be to organize the content in two buckets one being 'similarities' and the other 'differences' will make it clear and easier to consume.
@ekidenda We have this as an item for post-MVP. Let us know if the priority has changed.
@rosamundtgov the comparison matrix seems like information new entrants (awarded contractors and customers) will find useful. If the page is confusing, do we want to launch it as-is and potentially cause confusion?
I reviewed everything in the ready for PSHC Q&A and provided feedback. My understanding is if the page isn't done, move it back. If done, move it forward. Let me know if I might have missed something...? thanks.
@ekidenda Your process re: moving the items backwards or forwards is correct. I'll meet with the team about this and let you know when we have an update.
For MVP, maybe we launch the page as-is, and then post-MVP we can work on a redesign? For now, let's stick to content changes.
Moving this to done. We'll address design / content changes in a new card in post-MVP
As a buyer, I need to understand the key differences between legacy OASIS and OASIS+, so that I can plan my acquisition strategy accordingly.
As a prospective supplier, I need to understand the key differences between legacy OASIS and OASIS+, so that I can determine if OASIS+ supports my business strategy and I can prepare my offer (when OASIS+ reopens) accordingly.
Content
Design
Status