Develop and issue the solicitation (Buyers)

[vickimcfadden]

Buyers' guide > Develop and issue the solicitation

• • copy doc

Status

• [x] PSHC created content
• [x] SME reviewed content
• [x] PSHC incorporate SME feedback
• [x] SD reviewed content
• [x] PSHC incorporate SD feedback
• [x] Proof read
• [x] Content is done
• [x] Google doc is locked
• [x] Design created or template identified (use Content sub-page template)
• [x] Ready for development

Nav order

• Research the OASIS+ contract features
• Request a scope review
• Complete market research
• Research agencies and sellers (TBD)
• Get a Delegation of Procurement Authority
• Register in Symphony
• Develop the solicitation
• Award and manage the task order

[rosamundtgov]

@PowderD @ekidenda to confirm outstanding items.

[rosamundtgov]

metadata is done -

[rosamundtgov]

outstanding items confirmed -- page is ready to be built.

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman this is ready for design review at feature branch: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/preview/gsa/oasis-plus/wwang/solicitation/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/develop-issue-task-order-solicitation/

[klohman]

@weiwang-gsa Couple things:

• "Word" should be capitalized in this link - "Download Template for awards issued outside of Symphony [Word, 4 pages]"
• Under Prohibitions, 41 USC 3302 (c)(2)(A) link is missing
• Under Prohibitions, this entire text should be linked - "Prohibitions - Prohibited actions against or under OASIS+ contracts"
• Under Key Tutorials, link is missing for How to Set-Up Multi-Factor Authentication
• Under OASIS+ Off-Ramping, missing link for FAR subpart 9.4;
• Under OASIS+ Off-Ramping, missing link for FAR part 49

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman thanks, correction made, ready for review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/preview/gsa/oasis-plus/wwang/solicitation/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/develop-issue-task-order-solicitation/

[klohman]

@weiwang-gsa 👍 Looks good

[weiwang-gsa]

@ekidenda or @PowderD this is ready for QA review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/demo/gsa/oasis-plus/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/develop-issue-task-order-solicitation/

[PowderD]

@weiwang-gsa @klohman Forgive me if i forgot, but why is "Period of performance, contract place performance, and contract type" in bold while nothing else is?

[klohman]

@PowderD I don't know the original intent there but it may have just been a formatting error. I'll check with @rosamundtgov to confirm!

[PowderD]

Thank you! I can't think of a reason it would be bold so probably just a formatting thing.

I appreciate it

Jon DeWolfe | Program Manager Buyer Engagement Services Marketplace Federal Acquisition Service, U.S. General Services Administration |(: 208.830.8517 | *: @.***

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 2:41 PM Kristen Lohman @.***> wrote:

@PowderD https://github.com/PowderD I don't know the original intent there but it may have just been a formatting error. I'll check with @rosamundtgov https://github.com/rosamundtgov to confirm!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/137#issuecomment-2136069325, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDC4XAKFUJZLWJDRDHWIL53ZETTWPAVCNFSM6AAAAABDVFJZGOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMZWGA3DSMZSGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[ekidenda]

@weiwang-gsa recommend un-bolding: "Period of performance, contract place performance, and contract type" under the 'Operating constraints' bulleted list.

[PowderD]

Good to go @klohman

[rosamundtgov]

Sorry but double-checking @klohman - as part of this, did we add the file below (that we're linking to on the page) into public/files?

Template for awards issued outside of Symphony.docx

[klohman]

@rosamundtgov The template link works, if that's the question.

[rosamundtgov]

@klohman it's not - I'll explain offline