Buyers' landing page

[vickimcfadden]

As a buyer, I need to know when to expect OASIS+ contract awards to be made, and what is required next to solicit work under this contract vehicle, so that I can complete what is required (i.e. training) and evaluate whether this contract vehicle will work for my agency's upcoming requirements.

• Content
• Design

Status

• [x] Content created
• [x] Content reviewed by SD
• [x] Content reviewed by SME
• [x] Design finalized
• [x] Content finalized
• [x] Page developed

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman the page structure is ready, the png file is not good quality for bigger screen, so I used the SVG file, but SVG files are not with the same height, so looks kinda funky in buyer's guide landing page, I am not sure which software you used to create the SVG file, it it possible to adjust the original SVG files to have same height? Or can we crop the SVG file to the same height? I don't know how to use the illustrator to adjust svg file, and Mark said it is tricky to use it and he can help with svg file adjustments, but some of images are not going to looks good if we crop it, so want to double check with you first. Below are the pages for your reference: Buyers guide: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

If SVG are same height, it will looks like sellers guide, both buyers and sellers are using the same component: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/sellers-guide/

[klohman]

@weiwang-gsa I cropped this svg - can we see how this one looks and if it works well, I can do the same for the "Prepare your solicitation" image.

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman it looks like this below, maybe we should increase "Acquisition Planning" image's height a little bit, out of 5 images, acquisition planning one is shortest.

[vickimcfadden]

@rosamundtgov to ensure content matches + add links to can't find what you're looking for

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman @rosamundtgov this is ready for design review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

Please note, some of the links only have place holder, as doc content didn't specify it yet.

[klohman]

@weiwang-gsa couple questions and notes (I also updated the content doc with the known links)

1. In the info alert - can "Visit this page and OASIS+...." be on a separate line?
2. Can we change the styling at all on the headers inside the content list (i.e. "Determine if OASIS+ is the right fit") to styled as an h3?
3. The (coming soon) Get a scope review - should not be a link for MVP.
4. "Obtain a Delegation of Procurement Authority" should link to oasis-plus/buyers-guide/get-dpa (this page when developed)
5. "Register in Symphony" should link to oasis-plus/buyers-guide/register-in-symphony (this page)
6. "Tools and Resources" at the bottom should link to oasis-plus/tools-resources

cc @rosamundtgov

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman thanks, I will update accordingly, for #2, it will remains as H2, but you want it looks like H3, right? #3 seems in the content doc said it should be a link to scope review. I'll remove it. and thanks for providing links for #4-6.

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman @rosamundtgov what are these two links should pointing to? OASIS + Ordering guide and Oasis+ Interact Community

[weiwang-gsa]

@rosamundtgov would you mind providing the alt text for the images used in this page? (each header has an image with it)

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman updates are made, ready for review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

[rosamundtgov]

@rosamundtgov would you mind providing the alt text for the images used in this page? (each header has an image with it)

@weiwang-gsa

acq-planning-image.svg = Two people examining a diagram.

market-research-image.svg = Person drawing a chart showing data.

prepare-solicitation-image.svg = Person surrounded by text bubbles.

develop-solicitation-image.svg = Person working on a laptop while drawing on a tablet.

award-task-order-image.svg = Person standing in front of a monitor and pointing to an arrow.

[weiwang-gsa]

@klohman alt text update is in, ready for review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

[klohman]

@PowderD @ekidenda Ready for your review!

Note: Some links will go to 404 page because we haven't developed those pages yet, but you can check the url path to confirm it's linking to the correct page. The Ordering Guide link will not work - we have that separate issue to update that when ready.

[ekidenda]

First par/second sentence: change to “... smooth and streamlined process…” by removing the comma after smooth.

Remove the bullet point from “Notice to proceed: Estimated ...’ to keep it flash and stay consistent with the homepage formatting.

[weiwang-gsa]

@ekidenda text is updated, it is ready for QA review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

[vickimcfadden]

Sitting with @PowderD for consistency throughout we'll use buyers' guide and sellers' guide so please change location of apostrophe.

We can add a link /URL for the Scope Review Tool (link won't change), here: https://feedback.gsa.gov/jfe/form/SV_6s3udkBbX9z1zee

Otherwise we can consider this done.

[weiwang-gsa]

@vickimcfadden @PowderD since the scope review link is decided, should I remove "(coming soon)"?

[PowderD]

I would not remove it. We won't have OASIS+ option loaded into the scope tool until May/June

Jon DeWolfe | Program Manager Buyer Engagement Services Marketplace Federal Acquisition Service, U.S. General Services Administration |(: 208.830.8517 | *: @.***

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 3:26 PM Wei Wang @.***> wrote:

@vickimcfadden https://github.com/vickimcfadden @PowderD https://github.com/PowderD since the scope review link is decided, should I remove "(coming soon)"?

image.png (view on web) https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/assets/119954777/dc2d0c2b-29fa-4380-a285-7ef315b2e04e

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/51#issuecomment-1955222452, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDC4XAIZT6DFDRCQI62GYRLYUUPIBAVCNFSM6AAAAABC4XYRAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJVGIZDENBVGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[ekidenda]

@weiwang-gsa the text wasn't fully updated, specifically this part: First par/second sentence: change to “... smooth and streamlined process, with resources for every part of your journey.”

[weiwang-gsa]

@ekidenda @PowderD updates is made, ready for QA review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

[PowderD]

Do we want to use "free" anywhere in the scope review section? We regularly are asked whether there is a cost. In this small little blip it may be good to reiterate that it's an "optional free" service

Jon DeWolfe | Program Manager Buyer Engagement Services Marketplace Federal Acquisition Service, U.S. General Services Administration |(: 208.830.8517 | *: @.***

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:36 AM Wei Wang @.***> wrote:

@ekidenda https://github.com/ekidenda @PowderD https://github.com/PowderD updates is made, ready for QA review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/51#issuecomment-1956790275, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDC4XALGDNWS6SIQMNWH3NLYUYA57AVCNFSM6AAAAABC4XYRAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJWG44TAMRXGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[rosamundtgov]

Agreed that adding free would be beneficial.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:41 AM Jon DeWolfe @.***> wrote:

Do we want to use "free" anywhere in the scope review section? We regularly are asked whether there is a cost. In this small little blip it may be good to reiterate that it's an "optional free" service

Jon DeWolfe | Program Manager Buyer Engagement Services Marketplace Federal Acquisition Service, U.S. General Services Administration |(: 208.830.8517 | *: @.***

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:36 AM Wei Wang @.***> wrote:

@ekidenda https://github.com/ekidenda @PowderD https://github.com/PowderD updates is made, ready for QA review:

https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/51#issuecomment-1956790275, or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDC4XALGDNWS6SIQMNWH3NLYUYA57AVCNFSM6AAAAABC4XYRAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJWG44TAMRXGU>

. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/51#issuecomment-1956992858, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDDC6BBWSRRKWUL3X5FBZN3YUYIR5AVCNFSM6AAAAABC4XYRAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJWHE4TEOBVHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[PowderD]

We could also use "no-cost". Either option is fine. We just want to make sure it's blatant it's not at any cost to an Agency to request the scope review.

Jon DeWolfe | Program Manager Buyer Engagement Services Marketplace Federal Acquisition Service, U.S. General Services Administration |(: 208.830.8517 | *: @.***

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:46 AM Rosamund Lannin @.***> wrote:

Agreed that adding free would be beneficial.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:41 AM Jon DeWolfe @.***> wrote:

Do we want to use "free" anywhere in the scope review section? We regularly are asked whether there is a cost. In this small little blip it may be good to reiterate that it's an "optional free" service

Jon DeWolfe | Program Manager Buyer Engagement Services Marketplace Federal Acquisition Service, U.S. General Services Administration |(: 208.830.8517 | *: @.***

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:36 AM Wei Wang @.***> wrote:

@ekidenda https://github.com/ekidenda @PowderD https://github.com/PowderD updates is made, ready for QA review:

https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/51#issuecomment-1956790275,

or

unsubscribe <

https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDC4XALGDNWS6SIQMNWH3NLYUYA57AVCNFSM6AAAAABC4XYRAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJWG44TAMRXGU>

. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/51#issuecomment-1956992858, or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDDC6BBWSRRKWUL3X5FBZN3YUYIR5AVCNFSM6AAAAABC4XYRAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJWHE4TEOBVHA>

. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/oasis-plus/issues/51#issuecomment-1957261187, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDC4XAI7UH3GYCWMG3XNKXDYUYQETAVCNFSM6AAAAABC4XYRAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJXGI3DCMJYG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[weiwang-gsa]

@rosamundtgov @PowderD would you mind letting me know what exactly that needs to be changed? I am not sure which sentence or places that needs to be updated.

[rosamundtgov]

@weiwang-gsa Change GSA offers an optional OASIS+ scope review that helps determine if your requirement is within scope of the contract you are considering.

to

GSA offers a free, optional OASIS+ scope review that helps determine if your requirement is within scope of the contract you are considering.

[weiwang-gsa]

@rosamundtgov @PowderD text update is made to main branch, ready for QA review: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

[ekidenda]

@weiwang-gsa the update I requested wasn't done. Please see it here again: First par/second sentence: change to “... smooth and streamlined process, with resources for every part of your journey.” (The request is to add 'and' in that sentence as shown by the asterisk)

[weiwang-gsa]

@ekidenda, I am not sure if you didn't clear your cache or I misunderstand your request, please see below, the "and" is there: https://federalist-76c8d2ee-2655-47f7-8fa4-63811842d0a5.sites.pages.cloud.gov/site/gsa/oasis-plus/buyers-guide/

[PowderD]

This looks good to me. Any other updates needed @ekidenda or can we move it over?

[ekidenda]

@weiwang-gsa it is my cache. I can see it was updated in your snippet, but still shows the old version when I click on the design. I will clear my cache. The page looks good.

[vickimcfadden]

Moving to done!

[weiwang-gsa]

@ekidenda, just out of curiosity, you mentioned you clicked on the design, are you clicking the figma design in the user story description? that is Kirsten's design mock up, it won't get updated by engineer, and it is just initial design idea of the page's look and feel, the content typically won't updated afterwards. Whenever there is comments or request from you and Jon, engineer won't update the figma design, we make the change in code directly, and provide you the preview link after change is made, you can just click the link we provided (e.g. screen shot below the highlight link is your review link) and verify the changes there. Sometime you may need to clear your browser cache to reflect the changes.

in