spaw lag

[lexx1191]

Which modpack version are you using?

2.0.3.0

If in multiplayer; On which server does this happen?

single

What did you try to do, and what did you expect to happen?

spam lag with different coordinates

[19:20:10] [Client thread/WARN]: An error occoured while processing onPlayerUsesItem. Please report

[19:20:10] [Client thread/INFO]: InvTweaks: net.minecraft.client.gui.GuiTextField [19:20:10] [Client thread/INFO]: InvTweaks: successfully transformed setFocused/func_146195_b [19:20:14] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [310, 51, -328] in Dimension 0 with 139ms caused by an instance of class gregtech.common.tileentities.automation.GT_MetaTileEntity_SuperBuffer [19:20:15] [Server thread/WARN]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [299,63,-200] in Dimension 0 with 103 ms caused by an instance of class gregtech.api.metatileentity.implementations.GT_MetaPipeEntity_Fluid [19:20:38] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [265, 54, -196] in Dimension 0 with 152ms caused by an instance of class gregtech.api.metatileentity.implementations.GT_MetaTileEntity_BasicMachine_GT_Recipe [19:20:55] [Server thread/INFO]: Transforming Class (appeng.crafting.CraftingTreeProcess)

# latest.log repeats the same way lag

[19:23:29] [Client thread/WARN]: Detected invalid armor damage application: java.lang.Throwable at ic2.core.item.armor.ItemArmorElectric.setDamage(ItemArmorElectric.java:154) [ItemArmorElectric.class:?] at net.minecraft.item.ItemStack.func_77964_b(Unknown Source) [add.class:?] at codechicken.nei.PositionedStack.setPermutationToRender(PositionedStack.java:99) [PositionedStack.class:?] at codechicken.nei.PositionedStack.(PositionedStack.java:34) [PositionedStack.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.ShapedRecipeHandler$CachedShapedRecipe.setIngredients(ShapedRecipeHandler.java:53) [ShapedRecipeHandler$CachedShapedRecipe.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.ShapedRecipeHandler$CachedShapedRecipe.(ShapedRecipeHandler.java:35) [ShapedRecipeHandler$CachedShapedRecipe.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.ShapedRecipeHandler.forgeShapedRecipe(ShapedRecipeHandler.java:160) [ShapedRecipeHandler.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.ShapedRecipeHandler.loadUsageRecipes(ShapedRecipeHandler.java:137) [ShapedRecipeHandler.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.TemplateRecipeHandler.loadUsageRecipes(TemplateRecipeHandler.java:350) [TemplateRecipeHandler.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.TemplateRecipeHandler.getUsageHandler(TemplateRecipeHandler.java:472) [TemplateRecipeHandler.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.GuiUsageRecipe.openRecipeGui(GuiUsageRecipe.java:20) [GuiUsageRecipe.class:?] at codechicken.nei.recipe.RecipeItemInputHandler.lastKeyTyped(RecipeItemInputHandler.java:20) [RecipeItemInputHandler.class:?] at codechicken.nei.guihook.GuiContainerManager.lastKeyTyped(GuiContainerManager.java:307) [GuiContainerManager.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.gui.inventory.GuiContainer.func_73869_a(GuiContainer.java) [bex.class:?] at appeng.client.gui.implementations.GuiMEMonitorable.func_73869_a(GuiMEMonitorable.java:474) [GuiMEMonitorable.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.gui.inventory.GuiContainer.public_func_73869_a(GuiContainer.java) [bex.class:?] at codechicken.nei.guihook.GuiContainerManager.callKeyTyped(GuiContainerManager.java) [GuiContainerManager.class:?] at codechicken.nei.guihook.GuiContainerManager.keyTyped(GuiContainerManager.java:475) [GuiContainerManager.class:?] at codechicken.nei.guihook.GuiContainerManager.handleKeyboardInput(GuiContainerManager.java:465) [GuiContainerManager.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.gui.inventory.GuiContainer.func_146282_l(GuiContainer.java) [bex.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.gui.GuiScreen.func_146269_k(GuiScreen.java:276) [bdw.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.func_71407_l(Minecraft.java:1640) [bao.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.func_71411_J(Minecraft.java:973) [bao.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.func_99999_d(Minecraft.java:898) [bao.class:?] at net.minecraft.client.main.Main.main(SourceFile:148) [Main.class:?] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) ~[?:1.8.0_25] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) ~[?:1.8.0_25] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) ~[?:1.8.0_25] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) ~[?:1.8.0_25] at net.minecraft.launchwrapper.Launch.launch(Launch.java:135) [launchwrapper-1.12.jar:?] at net.minecraft.launchwrapper.Launch.main(Launch.java:28) [launchwrapper-1.12.jar:?]

What happend instead? (Attach screenshots if needed)

#

What do you suggest instead/what changes do you propose?

[bartimaeusnek]

which version of Optifine do you use?

[lexx1191]

OptiFine_1.7.10_HD_U_E3 ,Previous versions GTNH of the builds worked fine

[Dream-Master]

Newer than D6 need fastcraft 1.25

[lexx1191]

is worth fastcraft 1.25

[Dream-Master]

fastcraft 1.23 have more preformance than 1.25 I using Optifine D6 and Fastcraft 1.23 and i am fine

[lexx1191]

well, in the evening I will conduct the test

[Dream-Master]

ok let me know and close the issue when you think it is solved @lexx1191 thanks

[lexx1191]

spam remains, I will wait for the next version of the assembly, I close the question

[richardhendricks]

@lexx1191 Please retest with 2.0.4.5, I did a fix for Superbuffer lag.

[lexx1191]

[13:19:33] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [137, 44, -152] in Dimension 0 with 366193293ns caused by an instance of class gregtech.api.metatileentity.implementations.GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_Output [13:21:17] [Server thread/WARN]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [137,40,-149] in Dimension 0 with 157766721 ns caused by an instance of class gregtech.api.metatileentity.implementations.GT_MetaPipeEntity_Cable [13:21:41] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [292, 48, -347] in Dimension 0 with 284384191ns caused by an instance of class gregtech.api.metatileentity.implementations.GT_MetaTileEntity_BasicBatteryBuffer [13:22:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [133, 39, -162] in Dimension 0 with 106023996ns caused by an instance of class gtPlusPlus.xmod.gregtech.common.tileentities.storage.GT_MetaTileEntity_TieredTank

[13:29:06] [Server thread/WARN]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [257,51,-203] in Dimension 0 with 117833204 ns caused by an instance of class gregtech.api.metatileentity.implementations.GT_MetaPipeEntity_Cable [13:30:09] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] You can only sleep at night [13:31:18] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [310, 53, -377] in Dimension 0 with 114385545ns caused by an instance of class gregtech.api.metatileentity.implementations.GT_MetaTileEntity_BasicBatteryBuffer [13:31:20] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [310, 51, -329] in Dimension 0 with 107781745ns caused by an instance of class gregtech.common.tileentities.automation.GT_MetaTileEntity_SuperBuffer [13:32:22] [Server thread/INFO]: [gregtech.api.metatileentity.BaseMetaTileEntity:func_145845_h:580]: WARNING: Possible Lag Source at [133, 39, -168] in Dimension 0 with 353939608ns caused by an instance of class gtPlusPlus.xmod.gregtech.common.tileentities.storage.GT_MetaTileEntity_TieredTank

alas, still

[richardhendricks]

These look like your server is overloading in general. Is it doing other operations? The lag measurement is only the thread start/stop time. If the CPU/OS swaps to a different thread/process during execution, that time is added to the time on the block. The TieredTank lag source, is it really just a tiered tank? That to me says the server overall is overloaded, maybe doing virus scanning or other activities.

Please scan the reported blocks with the portable scanner.

Also, my comments on https://github.com/GTNewHorizons/NewHorizons/issues/3151 apply here - use a receiving output as small as possible since the super buffer has to compare every inventory slot against the receiving inventory slot.

[lexx1191]

i5 Haswell, 16 RAM, fps game jumps from 2 to 30, the game is allocated 3 cores, also running the Oracle to work, the problem with super buffers is, as small dust lag

on another computer, there is no optifine, and there is no Oracle, lag in the super buffer is present, try superbuffer to be replaced by something else

[richardhendricks]

What does the superbuffer output into? Just a packager?

Can you use the hand scanner on the superbuffer and other lag sources listed? I don't understand why a tiered tank would take 353939608ns (300+ms), except if the CPU is heavily loaded. Same for output hatch at 366193293ns.

[richardhendricks]

Game FPS is not the same as ticks/second

Use /xu_tps to get a ticks per second report. Look at the middle numbers.

[lexx1191]

https://imgur.com/a/jRg6SSu

[lexx1191]

https://imgur.com/a/HhdCo8F without optifine

https://imgur.com/a/UTjm4hc we'll have to choose it https://minecraft.curseforge.com/projects/autopackager

[Dream-Master]

@lexx1191 autopackager lags to hell if you add it. We remove it because of lag and because gt have a way to do it too.

[lexx1191]

https://imgur.com/a/upqdG4g scanner superbuffer tiny dust https://imgur.com/a/Ao84zwy scanner superbuffer small dust

reinstalling didn't help, at dust hit in the super buffer, there was a lag

[richardhendricks]

Please file new ticket if you are still having lag issues.

[lexx1191]

You can close the ticket, as a couple of days ago I started a new game, thanks.