Hello! First and foremost I would like to gush about how wonderful redundans is. Thank you so much for putting it together and continuing to maintain it.
I would like to address a possible bug or misunderstanding. I run redundans using the --noscaffolding and --nogapclosing parameters, and this is what the run text reads:
Hi @pdimens , thanks for spotting the nonsense in the code and all the nice words :) I will resolve it in the next release, which I've been thinking for a while now.
Hello! First and foremost I would like to gush about how wonderful redundans is. Thank you so much for putting it together and continuing to maintain it.
I would like to address a possible bug or misunderstanding. I run redundans using the
--noscaffolding
and--nogapclosing
parameters, and this is what the run text reads:Notably, I see:
nogaplosing=False
(should be true?)noreduction=True
(should be false?)noscaffolding=False
(should be true?)