Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
my mistake, just found out the changes on Arduino v1.0 RC so latest version of
this library is only compatible with v1.0RC not arduino 0022 or below, have
reverted to prior version of this library
Original comment by madeino...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 6:24
Here is a patch that makes it compatible with both.
Original comment by paul.sto...@gmail.com
on 29 Oct 2011 at 7:31
Attachments:
Thanks for the patch. I wasn't sure if its better to release 2 versions of the
library (pre vs. port arduino-1.0) or put in some #ifdef#s like in your patch.
I guess the #ifdef stuff is the better option.
But since I'm no a C++ expert, why is there the
using Print::write;
statement in the Patch? Do we need this?
Class DogLcd is derived from class Print and implements the virtual function
write()
I couldn't find out why the using directiove is in the patch.
The code compiles fine on 0022 and 1.0 (-Wall turned on)
Original comment by e.fa...@wayoda.org
on 29 Oct 2011 at 11:22
using Print::write allows the other write() API functions to work.
char *str="my string";
lcd.write(str)
and
char buf[4] = {'t','e','s','r'};
lcd.write(buf, 4);
Without using Print::write, these won't compile.
Original comment by paul.sto...@gmail.com
on 29 Oct 2011 at 3:27
I applied the patch, but had no time yet to check this with my hardware.
I have uploaded a release candidate for testing.
Original comment by e.fa...@wayoda.org
on 30 Oct 2011 at 3:27
I did some hardware tests with Arduino 0022 and Arduino 1.0-RC2 and it looks
like the library is fit for both versions.
If Arduino can go for version 1.0 with 325 issues on the TODO list, I guess its
ok to also push the DogLcd Version number to 1.0.0 ;-)
Original comment by e.fa...@wayoda.org
on 7 Nov 2011 at 4:32
I tested DogLcd 1.0.0 on a Teensy 2.0 with both Arduino 0022 and 1.0-rc2.
Works great. :-)
As for Arduino's issue list, seems like a lot of it is old or abandoned ideas.
At least a few "patches welcome" issues where I've submitted a patch, but it's
sitting unused. Some have sat for so long that nearby code has changed and the
patches don't apply cleanly anymore. Doesn't exactly inspire a lot of
enthuasiasm to contribute....
Original comment by paul.sto...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2011 at 9:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
madeino...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 5:34