code maintainability badge

[nstarman]

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• [x] Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
• [x] Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
• [x] Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
• [x] Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
• [x] Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see "When to rebase and squash commits".
• [x] Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the Extra CI label.
• [x] Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the no-changelog-entry-needed label. If this is a manual backport, use the skip-changelog-checks label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
• [x] Is a milestone set? Milestone must be set but astropy-bot check might be missing; do not let the green checkmark fool you.
• [x] At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate backport-X.Y.x label(s) before merge.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 95.58%. Comparing base (9c61c3f) to head (92ea7ac). Report is 34 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #10 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 95.58% 95.58% ======================================= Files 14 14 Lines 1471 1471 ======================================= Hits 1406 1406 Misses 65 65 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.