GalaxyHunters / Evolution-Machine-Satellite-Galaxies

Creating a Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of Satellite Galaxy Evolution
0 stars 0 forks source link

Starburst Check #78

Closed Beilinson closed 3 years ago

Beilinson commented 4 years ago

DOD_1 - Go through Starburst examples, confirm or deny them being swansong.

DOD_2 - Talk with adam over which features to try running with.

Beilinson commented 4 years ago

First, an example: plot_VELA_v2 Thick 07_tmp_00041 Plot of 07_0041, as in your paper. Points where no data because merger tree did not detect are at -1. This is to separate from point where sSFR is actually 0. (i.e, around 9 and 11, and at the beginning and end.) sSFR = Log10(sSFR(0.5kpc)[1/yr] Mcg = Log10(Mcg[Msun]

Beilinson commented 4 years ago

Rest of gals:

Beilinson commented 4 years ago

plot_VELA_v2 Thick 07_tmp_00027 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 01_tmp_00010 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 02_tmp_00001 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 04_tmp_00005 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 30_tmp_00014 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 07_tmp_00050 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 07_tmp_00055 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 07_tmp_00067 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 08_tmp_00010 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 10_tmp_00050 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 12_tmp_00013 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 13_tmp_00008 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 24_tmp_00008 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 27_tmp_00009 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 28_tmp_00005 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 29_tmp_00060 plot_VELA_v2 Thick 29_tmp_00093

Beilinson commented 4 years ago

Btw some of these are here because I was wondering if it's even worth it still keeping them in the dataset, such as VELA_v2.Thick.13_tmp_00008 Where its not even making sense whats going on with the tgid.