Hi, I get another InternalReasonerException, that happens when I call isConsistent after adding any axiom. I'm using owlapi 5.1.5 and openllet-owlapi 2.6.5-SNAPSHOT / 9c5928a.
Relevant code:
reasoner.precomputeInferences(InferenceType.CLASS_HIERARCHY);
reasoner.instances(CLASS_PROCESSMODEL).forEach(p -> {
manager.addAxiom(ont, factory.getOWLDataPropertyAssertionAxiom(DATA_PROPERTY_HASMODELCOMPONENTID, p, "AddingEdgeTest"));
});
reasoner.flush();
if (!reasoner.isConsistent()) { // throws InternalReasonerException
throw new InternalError("inconsistent after adding a ModelID!");
}
Stacktrace:
openllet.core.exceptions.InternalReasonerException: Adding edge to a pruned _node anon(1) hasSourceState state89971606167054
at openllet.core.boxes.abox.Individual.addEdge(Individual.java:1080)
at openllet.core.tableau.completion.CompletionStrategy.addEdge(CompletionStrategy.java:516)
at openllet.core.rules.ContinuousRulesStrategy.addEdge(ContinuousRulesStrategy.java:84)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.ProductionNode$Edge.activate(ProductionNode.java:158)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaNode.activateChildren(BetaNode.java:28)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaMemoryNode.activate(BetaMemoryNode.java:74)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaNode.activateChildren(BetaNode.java:28)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaMemoryNode.activate(BetaMemoryNode.java:74)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaNode.activateChildren(BetaNode.java:28)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaMemoryNode.activate(BetaMemoryNode.java:74)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaNode.activateChildren(BetaNode.java:28)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaMemoryNode.activate(BetaMemoryNode.java:74)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaNode.activateChildren(BetaNode.java:28)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.BetaTopNode.activate(BetaTopNode.java:33)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.AlphaNode.lambda$activate$1(AlphaNode.java:49)
at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1257)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.AlphaNode.activate(AlphaNode.java:49)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.AlphaTypeNode.activate(AlphaTypeNode.java:60)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.AlphaNetwork.activateType(AlphaNetwork.java:150)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.AlphaNetwork.activateIndividual(AlphaNetwork.java:133)
at java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Iterator.java:116)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.AlphaNetwork.activateAll(AlphaNetwork.java:119)
at openllet.core.rules.rete.Interpreter.run(Interpreter.java:60)
at openllet.core.rules.ContinuousRulesStrategy.applyRete(ContinuousRulesStrategy.java:145)
at openllet.core.rules.ContinuousRulesStrategy.complete(ContinuousRulesStrategy.java:224)
at openllet.core.boxes.abox.ABoxImpl.lambda$isConsistent$12(ABoxImpl.java:1417)
at openllet.core.utils.Timers.execute(Timers.java:118)
at openllet.core.boxes.abox.ABoxImpl.isConsistent(ABoxImpl.java:1417)
at openllet.core.boxes.abox.ABoxImpl.isConsistent(ABoxImpl.java:1269)
at openllet.core.KnowledgeBaseImpl.consistency(KnowledgeBaseImpl.java:1802)
at openllet.core.KnowledgeBaseImpl.isConsistent(KnowledgeBaseImpl.java:1877)
at openllet.core.KnowledgeBaseImplFullSync.isConsistent(KnowledgeBaseImplFullSync.java:403)
at openllet.owlapi.PelletReasoner.isConsistent(PelletReasoner.java:1032)
at de.athalis.owl.PrunedNode.printProcesses(PrunedNode.java:75)
at de.athalis.owl.PrunedNode.main(PrunedNode.java:29)
This happens with both the default reasoner and also with the buffering one. I generated seven minimal ontologies with a modified SearchMinimalBug: it calls addAxiom and tests specifically for this InternalReasonerException, and also doesn't perform the anonymization to keep the ontologies understandable / comparable. I uploaded the files along the Java code here: https://github.com/Locke/pruned_node
Hi, I get another InternalReasonerException, that happens when I call
isConsistent
after adding any axiom. I'm using owlapi 5.1.5 and openllet-owlapi 2.6.5-SNAPSHOT / 9c5928a.Relevant code:
Stacktrace:
This happens with both the default reasoner and also with the buffering one. I generated seven minimal ontologies with a modified SearchMinimalBug: it calls addAxiom and tests specifically for this InternalReasonerException, and also doesn't perform the anonymization to keep the ontologies understandable / comparable. I uploaded the files along the Java code here: https://github.com/Locke/pruned_node