Closed steakfest closed 10 months ago
Would it be possible to have both keys work for specifying that data as a way of "fixing" it with backwards compatibility?
How embarrassing 😬 I guess adding an alternative field with the correct spelling would be fine, with a notification that the incorrect field will be removed in the future.
It is not actually working in the first place :(
Nothing is mapped:
terraformModule:
configMapSeclector:
name: terraform
key: main.tf
Nothing is mapped:
terraformModule:
configMapSeclector:
name: terraform
Error:
terraformModule:
configMapSelector:
name: terraform
Is the configmap in the same namespace as the tf-resource?
ofcourse. I solved my problem in a different way by inlining the files I needed in the tf file with the <<
operator
Was testing with using the "configMapSelector" which failed to work and I quickly realized that the word "Selector" in that CRD field name is misspelled (Seclector). Searched the issues for that string to see if this was already discussed.
For me the fix was to simply use the incorrect spelling for Selector in that key name, but might be a good thing to tidy up. Not sure what options are for backwards compatibility though since this is part of the CRD.
Would it be possible to have both keys work for specifying that data as a way of "fixing" it with backwards compatibility?