Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Added WishList type and lowered priority.
Original comment by fuzio...@gmail.com
on 1 Sep 2010 at 2:22
So we can code a padding workaround in EOF, could you please indicate how much
padding FoFiX would need to read a vocal chart correctly? Would 1 delta
between a lyric phrase marker and the first lyric in that line be sufficient?
Original comment by raynebc
on 1 Sep 2010 at 4:31
This might have also been caused in cases where the first lyric in a phrase was
defined after the lyric phrase on marker, even though they were at the same
delta time. EOF's behavior has been altered to ensure the vocal track will
never be written this way, but if you can check if padding is actually
necessary, we can make accommodations for that.
Original comment by raynebc
on 1 Sep 2010 at 6:52
Original comment by fuzio...@gmail.com
on 2 Sep 2010 at 2:20
Not sure why this is still categorized as "wish list", considering it's
technically a defect, as per Harmonix documentation.
Anyways, gunder confirmed that 5 deltas of padding worked fine, so I lowered
the padding amount to 1 delta. It remains to be seen whether this works around
the lyric parsing bug.
Original comment by raynebc
on 20 Nov 2010 at 1:24
Original comment by fuzio...@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2010 at 4:24
The padding workaround in EOF wasn't working as of stable release 1.7 (r571),
but was corrected in 574 (5 deltas of padding) and 575 (1 delta of padding).
If the developers need to create any vocal charts for replicating this issue,
these revisions should help. Gunder submitted screen captures showing how this
bug presents:
http://s13.directupload.net/file/d/2356/6i4tsl6t_png.htm
Sometimes the first lyric in the affected phrase is grayed out, and sometimes
it is not displayed at all. I don't know if it's actually being scored for in
either of those cases.
Original comment by raynebc
on 27 Nov 2010 at 6:29
It was indicated that 1 delta tick of padding wasn't enough, so I changed EOF's
padding back to 5 deltas. But this is still just a workaround to the problem.
Original comment by raynebc
on 19 Jan 2011 at 7:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
raynebc
on 9 Jul 2010 at 11:08