Closed Garrafao closed 9 months ago
@AinaIanemahy Running python ./tests/integration/test_random_annotate.py
currently gives this: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'random_annotate'
. Do we want to keep the random annotator?
With commit 313dd58 python ./tests/integration/test_xl_lexeme_annotate.py
is running after re-factoring.
@AinaIanemahy Running
python ./tests/integration/test_random_annotate.py
currently gives this:ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'random_annotate'
. Do we want to keep the random annotator?
@Garrafao I would keep the random annotator. I have added the random_annotate.py script in the most recent commit. 031fa97
@AinaIanemahy Running
python ./tests/integration/test_random_annotate.py
currently gives this:ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'random_annotate'
. Do we want to keep the random annotator?@Garrafao I would keep the random annotator. I have added the random_annotate.py script in the most recent commit. 031fa97
As far as I understand random annotation is now done in annotate.py. In contrast to what I said in the meeting, I now think that it can stay there.
Many dependencies are introduced by the binary XLMR annotator. We don't need this one anymore. Hence, we should remove it and all its dependencies and considerably simplify and re-factor input and output format.