This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of nyc.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
8c58d68fix: address edge-cases related to --all when instrumentation is disabled (#482)
8b58c05feat: allow eager instantiation of instrumenter (#490)
d8d2de0feat: upgrade to istanbul-lib-instrument with support for 'const foo = function () {}' name preservation. upgrade to istanbul-lib-hook with fix for ts-node. (#494)
7708235chore: add test and docs for high and low watermarks (#493)
0a1d72afeat: reporting watermarks can now be set in nyc config stanza (#469)
1022b16fix: pass configuration options to --check-coverage (#483)
7b4c090chore(package): update tap to version 9.0.3 (#488)
Hello lovely humans,
nyc just published its new version 10.1.2.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of nyc. Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right? Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project :sparkles:
You rock!
:palm_tree:
The new version differs by 35 commits .
e46335fchore(release): 10.1.225aec77fix: revert defaulting to empty file-coverage report, this caused too many issuese03cd48chore(release): 10.1.181229a0fix: fix bug related to merging coverage reports see #4828f7af3achore(release): 10.1.08c58d68fix: address edge-cases related to --all when instrumentation is disabled (#482)8b58c05feat: allow eager instantiation of instrumenter (#490)d8d2de0feat: upgrade to istanbul-lib-instrument with support for 'const foo = function () {}' name preservation. upgrade to istanbul-lib-hook with fix for ts-node. (#494)7708235chore: add test and docs for high and low watermarks (#493)0a1d72afeat: reporting watermarks can now be set in nyc config stanza (#469)1022b16fix: pass configuration options to --check-coverage (#483)7b4c090chore(package): update tap to version 9.0.3 (#488)093963bchore(release): 10.0.2e01ec8cfix: upgrade to newer istanbul-lib-instrument, with fixes for inferred function names (#479)2e39e00chore(release): 10.0.1There are 35 commits in total. See the full diff.
This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
Tired of seeing this sponsor message? :zap:
greenkeeper upgrade