Gary-Community-Ventures / benefits-calculator

MIT License
4 stars 3 forks source link

Step 8 - Reword / bold #692

Closed sydney-devine closed 4 days ago

sydney-devine commented 10 months ago

Step 8 - existing benefits. Re-write so that it's consistent across the board.

Cash Assistance

Food and Nutrition

Child Care, Youth, and Education

Housing and Utilities

Transportation

Health Care

Tax Credits

sydney-devine commented 7 months ago

@kbottagaro this one's been sitting for a minute. I think we had wanted to flip the name of the benefit with the descriptor, bold the benefit name and then have the descriptor come after it?

Ex:

Mostly not sure if this ticket is still a need or not. I think the initial complaint we had internally was that it was all a bit hard to read and words were kinda jumbling together.

kbottagaro commented 7 months ago

I don't recall this ticket. One other suggestion - because I do think Step 8 is rather wordy - we could reference the name of the program only without the description, assuming that people might know the program by its name if they're receiving that benefit. If we keep the descriptor, people might find it easier to navigate this step if we lead with the program name.

sydney-devine commented 7 months ago

I don't recall this ticket. One other suggestion - because I do think Step 8 is rather wordy - we could reference the name of the program only without the description, assuming that people might know the program by its name if they're receiving that benefit. If we keep the descriptor, people might find it easier to navigate this step if we lead with the program name.

I'll talk about it with the team. It's probably worth re-writing. I think leading with program name like examples I gave is probably the way to go, but will circle back.

kbottagaro commented 7 months ago

Ok, sounds good.

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:59 PM sydney-devine @.***> wrote:

I don't recall this ticket. One other suggestion - because I do think Step 8 is rather wordy - we could reference the name of the program only without the description, assuming that people might know the program by its name if they're receiving that benefit. If we keep the descriptor, people might find it easier to navigate this step if we lead with the program name.

I'll talk about it with the team. It's probably worth re-writing. I think leading with program name like examples I gave is probably the way to go, but will circle back.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Gary-Community-Ventures/benefits-calculator/issues/692#issuecomment-1947329869, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDVPUZPB3RYFO6EYGRQCK53YTZZKLAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6ZVCKOGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNBXGMZDSOBWHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.*** com>