Open acforvs opened 4 years ago
While it would indeed seem nice to have break
, language features should generally be worth implementing.
Currently, we can use a rewrite. If the program was:
while condition:
statements1
if mid1:
break
statements2
if mid2:
break
statements3
Then it can be written as such:
ok := 1
while ok & (condition):
statements1
if mid1:
ok := 0
if ok:
statements2
if mid2:
ok := 0
if ok:
statements3
So, while it a bit lengthy, the solutions requiring break
are currently doable with such rewrite.
Is there a solution which is critically affected by the lack of break
, as in, it times out if we use a rewrite but would pass if we had break
?
@GassaFM yeah, we can surely use a rewrite, and unfortunately (or fortunately) I do not know the solution that is critically affected by the lack of break
.
However, the break
looks like a doable feature that can speed some solutions up and provide much more readable code, so I opened this issue.
It would be nice to have
break
statement