gate-asm has been updated to ASM version 9, but the EmptyVisitor class that we use as the base for our visitors still uses the ASM5 opcodes definition. This means that the visitor still fails when asked to process classes that use newer features, see https://groups.io/g/gate-users/message/1156 for an example.
Fixing this is not necessarily as simple as switching the opcodes to ASM9 when calling the superclass constructors, we need to audit that we're not using any methods that are deprecated in v9 and adjust accordingly.
gate-asmhas been updated to ASM version 9, but theEmptyVisitorclass that we use as the base for our visitors still uses theASM5opcodes definition. This means that the visitor still fails when asked to process classes that use newer features, see https://groups.io/g/gate-users/message/1156 for an example.Fixing this is not necessarily as simple as switching the opcodes to
ASM9when calling the superclass constructors, we need to audit that we're not using any methods that are deprecated in v9 and adjust accordingly.