Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
This is not how we normally fly traditional helicopters. We learn that the
controls change and keep track of orientation. 10+ years ago RC transmitters
had switches which reversed the controls and all it did was cause crashes when
we lost track of which position the switch was in. Adding this feature would
seem to add an unnecessary complication. All heli pilots today learn to fly
inverted with changing the control mixing.
Original comment by Wingspin...@gmail.com
on 8 Jan 2012 at 2:22
It would actually be very useful in stabilize mode. Gain lots of altitude, flip
the switch, and let the system invert its self. It would be nothing for the
ArduPilot to operate in stabilize mode with an inverted option.
At the same time, you should keep the control scheme homogenous for the user.
It could act as a basic training mode for users to get the feel for how the
controls work when the heli is inverted, and still give stability for when
things got hairy.
Users can fly in the simulator to learn without consequences, then fly in
inverted stabilize mode to get a basic feel for the real thing.
Original comment by lyu...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2012 at 10:55
Just some thoughts and suggestions.
I too fly helicopters..
I would expect APM to invoke a complete paradigm shift under its typical modes.
I.e., consistent control behavior all throughout the modes and orientation,
inverted or not, including Simple and Super Simple mode.
Outside of these modes, to support traditional 3D flying, I would suggest
introducing a 3D-Acro mode, i.e., stabilized, but with maxed control responses,
and reverse control orientation when flying inverted.
Just some thoughts.
Original comment by dberr...@gmail.com
on 1 Apr 2013 at 4:08
Closing all issues on the old issues list and marking them WontFix 'cuz I don't
want to mark them as "done"
Original comment by rmackay...@gmail.com
on 21 Jul 2013 at 2:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rmackay...@gmail.com
on 5 Jan 2012 at 12:43