GayaBalan / ivybeans

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/ivybeans
0 stars 0 forks source link

JSP Editor does not resolve TLD from Ivy Dependencies #62

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The JSP editor in JEE projects does not recognize TLDs contained in
libaries referenced through IvyBeans. The editor shows an error in the
first line referencing the TLD and does not support auto completion.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by FlorianB...@gmail.com on 9 Nov 2009 at 10:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The same is true for generated sources, i.e. source code that is generated into
build/generated-sources/**

The source files from this folder are accessible through Netbeans (there is a 
node
Generated Sources in the Projects view), but are marked with errors, and when 
using
the generated classes in other code, autocompletion is not working.

Original comment by FlorianB...@gmail.com on 12 Nov 2009 at 12:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 12 Nov 2009 at 1:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am also seeing problems with resolving imports in JSP pages when the classes 
are in the ivy libraries. I had to add the .jar file stored in the ivy cache to 
my project to get the import to resolve.

Original comment by br...@hulseware.com on 12 Oct 2010 at 11:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Predictably, the same thing happens when editing facelets for a JSF program. 

I'm guessing that IvyBeans needs to publish these jars more widely to the 
Netbeans framework.

Original comment by malcolm....@googlemail.com on 9 Nov 2010 at 9:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Um, hi, getting the same problems as above.
I'm trying to convince my colleagues that we should be using Ivy based 
dependency management, but this bug makes it hard to get the Netbeans user's 
convinced.

ANY chance there has been some progress on this? 
Since you know, the dates here go back to 2009?

Original comment by hs.coet...@gmail.com on 11 Feb 2011 at 8:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Finally, I managed to dive into the source code and understand what is 
happening. Please find attached a patch for this issue.

Original comment by florian....@3kraft.com on 3 May 2011 at 12:08

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Ok for WEB_INF and WEB_SOURCE but not for TEST_SOURCE.

Thanks for the patch.

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 20 Jul 2011 at 1:37