Closed quicquid closed 4 years ago
Right, currently, I don't think that any smtlib annotations are recognized by the type-checker.
I'll add support for the :named
annotation, and the :pattern
one (which I just found out while re-reading the smtlib spec), but are there other standards annotations for smtlib ?
Sorry for the delay, this should be fixed in b4caf0b18a975b3581826975ddee594f3a2281ab
Please consider the following smtlib script:
Each of the named assertion leads to a warning:
I'm not sure how to interpret the warning - cvc4 and z3 correctly compute the unsat core for the problem though.