jehturner commented 1 year ago

This does what it says in the title. ~This is still pending a proper test run~, but I'm creating a draft PR to summarize the changes since it has to be done by Tues.

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Merging #415 (7d8740a) into master (e63df0e) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

:exclamation: Current head 7d8740a differs from pull request most recent head a731d04. Consider uploading reports for the commit a731d04 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #415   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.46%   61.46%           
=======================================
  Files         257      257           
  Lines       31134    31134           
=======================================
  Hits        19138    19138           
  Misses      11996    11996

Flag	Coverage Δ
f2	`22.71% <ø> (ø)`
gmosls	`37.46% <ø> (ø)`
gnirs	`22.53% <ø> (ø)`
gsaoi	`16.09% <ø> (ø)`
integration	`32.83% <ø> (ø)`
niri	`22.57% <ø> (ø)`
regression	`30.91% <ø> (ø)`
slow	`45.12% <ø> (ø)`
unit	`50.50% <ø> (ø)`
wavecal	`22.26% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

KathleenLabrie commented 1 year ago

Speaking for myself, now is a good time to make a full switch to conda-forge, both for master and release/3.1.x.

jehturner commented 1 year ago

I'll also merge the conda_forge_3.1.x branch into release/3.1.x, which is a very similar set of changes (I've redone 3 out of the 4 squashed commits as straight cherry picks). And also conda_forge_3.0.x -> release/3.0.x when I'm finished with it, which is similar but with significantly different dependencies.

GeminiDRSoftware / DRAGONS

Update `master` tests/docs to use conda-forge instead of Astroconda #415

Codecov Report