Closed gowerc closed 6 months ago
Filename Stmts Miss Cover Missing
------------------------------- ------- ------ ------- --------------------------------
R/brier_score.R 166 0 100.00%
R/DataJoint.R 76 2 97.37% 264, 270
R/DataLongitudinal.R 119 1 99.16% 244
R/DataSubject.R 85 1 98.82% 142
R/DataSurvival.R 98 0 100.00%
R/defaults.R 10 6 40.00% 18-57, 84
R/generics.R 31 4 87.10% 51, 395, 414, 449
R/Grid.R 27 1 96.30% 170
R/GridEven.R 32 0 100.00%
R/GridFixed.R 30 0 100.00%
R/GridGrouped.R 52 0 100.00%
R/GridManual.R 23 3 86.96% 78-80
R/GridObserved.R 20 0 100.00%
R/GridPopulation.R 31 4 87.10% 61, 69-71
R/GridPrediction.R 36 6 83.33% 83, 91-95
R/JointModel.R 123 8 93.50% 141-143, 193, 197, 239, 285, 291
R/JointModelSamples.R 59 0 100.00%
R/link_generics.R 10 2 80.00% 59, 76
R/Link.R 62 4 93.55% 200-203
R/LinkComponent.R 19 3 84.21% 88, 120-121
R/LongitudinalGSF.R 77 0 100.00%
R/LongitudinalModel.R 19 0 100.00%
R/LongitudinalQuantities.R 71 0 100.00%
R/LongitudinalRandomSlope.R 36 0 100.00%
R/LongitudinalSteinFojo.R 70 5 92.86% 143-147
R/Parameter.R 14 0 100.00%
R/ParameterList.R 42 1 97.62% 184
R/Prior.R 236 8 96.61% 481, 577, 589-607
R/Promise.R 25 0 100.00%
R/Quantities.R 60 0 100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorPopulation.R 22 0 100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorPrediction.R 48 0 100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorSubject.R 19 0 100.00%
R/settings.R 12 12 0.00% 55-69
R/SimGroup.R 5 0 100.00%
R/SimJointData.R 72 1 98.61% 103
R/SimLongitudinal.R 5 2 60.00% 22, 40
R/SimLongitudinalGSF.R 51 0 100.00%
R/SimLongitudinalRandomSlope.R 42 0 100.00%
R/SimLongitudinalSteinFojo.R 48 0 100.00%
R/SimSurvival.R 104 0 100.00%
R/StanModel.R 15 0 100.00%
R/StanModule.R 176 6 96.59% 192-193, 235, 246, 383, 411
R/SurvivalExponential.R 10 0 100.00%
R/SurvivalLoglogistic.R 11 0 100.00%
R/SurvivalModel.R 19 0 100.00%
R/SurvivalQuantities.R 170 1 99.41% 125
R/SurvivalWeibullPH.R 11 0 100.00%
R/utilities.R 143 1 99.30% 13
R/zzz.R 28 25 10.71% 3, 8-12, 14-35, 47
TOTAL 2770 107 96.14%
Filename Stmts Miss Cover
------------ ------- ------ -------
R/generics.R +1 +1 -2.90%
TOTAL +1 +1 -0.03%
Results for commit: fbfc8de70cd86078ce42e0e00ac394e6659b4987
Minimum allowed coverage is 80%
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results
1 files 42 suites 8m 11s :stopwatch: 137 tests 106 :white_check_mark: 31 :zzz: 0 :x: 928 runs 897 :white_check_mark: 31 :zzz: 0 :x:
Results for commit fbfc8de7.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
Test Suite | $Status$ | Time on main |
$±Time$ | $±Tests$ | $±Skipped$ | $±Failures$ | $±Errors$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GridPrediction | 💚 | $130.96$ | $-4.39$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ |
Results for commit 991ced5e297f83d69fe095220c756015f9e55d33
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.
@danielinteractive , I've attempted to address all the review comments. The big change here (based on your above comments) was that I've also added an additional custom-model.Rmd
vignette that shows a complete end to end example for a user to fit their own model based on a model that isn't implemented in the package yet.
Note that I also show how to fit a custom simulation function here though this isn't actually detailed anywhere, I've added a new issue (#323) to cover this in a separate PR.
Closes #316
@danielinteractive - Would appreciate potentially a bit more scrutiny on this one as I imagine this is an area that users are likely to dabble in with 3rd party models that we haven't yet implemented. It is also quite a bit more complicated to explain than the survival models so would appreciate it if you could highlight areas that don't make sense or need further clarification.