Closed gowerc closed 5 months ago
Filename Stmts Miss Cover Missing
------------------------------- ------- ------ ------- --------------------------------
R/brier_score.R 166 0 100.00%
R/DataJoint.R 76 2 97.37% 264, 270
R/DataLongitudinal.R 119 1 99.16% 244
R/DataSubject.R 85 1 98.82% 142
R/DataSurvival.R 98 0 100.00%
R/defaults.R 10 6 40.00% 18-57, 84
R/generics.R 31 4 87.10% 51, 395, 414, 449
R/Grid.R 27 1 96.30% 173
R/GridEven.R 32 0 100.00%
R/GridEvent.R 22 0 100.00%
R/GridFixed.R 30 0 100.00%
R/GridGrouped.R 52 0 100.00%
R/GridManual.R 23 3 86.96% 78-80
R/GridObserved.R 20 0 100.00%
R/GridPopulation.R 31 4 87.10% 61, 69-71
R/GridPrediction.R 36 6 83.33% 83, 91-95
R/JointModel.R 123 8 93.50% 141-143, 193, 197, 239, 285, 291
R/JointModelSamples.R 59 0 100.00%
R/link_generics.R 13 3 76.92% 59, 76, 91
R/Link.R 62 4 93.55% 200-203
R/LinkComponent.R 19 3 84.21% 88, 120-121
R/LongitudinalGSF.R 82 0 100.00%
R/LongitudinalModel.R 19 0 100.00%
R/LongitudinalQuantities.R 71 0 100.00%
R/LongitudinalRandomSlope.R 41 5 87.80% 93-97
R/LongitudinalSteinFojo.R 75 5 93.33% 143-147
R/Parameter.R 14 0 100.00%
R/ParameterList.R 42 1 97.62% 184
R/Prior.R 236 8 96.61% 481, 577, 589-607
R/Promise.R 25 0 100.00%
R/Quantities.R 60 0 100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorPopulation.R 22 0 100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorPrediction.R 48 0 100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorSubject.R 19 0 100.00%
R/settings.R 12 12 0.00% 55-69
R/SimGroup.R 5 0 100.00%
R/SimJointData.R 72 1 98.61% 103
R/SimLongitudinal.R 5 2 60.00% 22, 40
R/SimLongitudinalGSF.R 53 0 100.00%
R/SimLongitudinalRandomSlope.R 42 0 100.00%
R/SimLongitudinalSteinFojo.R 50 0 100.00%
R/SimSurvival.R 104 0 100.00%
R/StanModel.R 15 0 100.00%
R/StanModule.R 176 6 96.59% 192-193, 235, 246, 383, 411
R/SurvivalExponential.R 10 0 100.00%
R/SurvivalLoglogistic.R 11 0 100.00%
R/SurvivalModel.R 19 0 100.00%
R/SurvivalQuantities.R 170 1 99.41% 125
R/SurvivalWeibullPH.R 11 0 100.00%
R/utilities.R 143 1 99.30% 13
R/zzz.R 28 25 10.71% 3, 8-12, 14-35, 47
TOTAL 2814 113 95.98%
Filename Stmts Miss Cover
---------- ------- ------ --------
TOTAL 0 0 +100.00%
Results for commit: 2306065191634f31478bba9ffe5a69d0e9df74ae
Minimum allowed coverage is 80%
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results
Test Suite | $Status$ | Time on main |
$±Time$ | $±Tests$ | $±Skipped$ | $±Failures$ | $±Errors$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JointModelSamples | 💔 | $33.34$ | $+1.79$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ |
Results for commit a9be1f5241ba6e21f9cef5699f4ab06a562b6f46
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.
1 files 140 suites 7m 25s :stopwatch: 131 tests 104 :white_check_mark: 27 :zzz: 0 :x: 934 runs 902 :white_check_mark: 32 :zzz: 0 :x:
Results for commit 23060651.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
Closes #349
Bit of a deviation from the original issue. The initial values are indeed correct but there was a bit of inconsistency that the model and formulas were specifying the raw value but the simulation functions were specifying the exp(value). I've updated the simulation functions to specify the raw value so that everything is consistent.
Sorry to re-explain that I originally thought the initial values were wrong because they were so wildly different to the values I was specifying in the simulation function. But they aren't wrong they are just on different scales which is confusing so I have harmonised the scales.