Closed kristoferlund closed 11 months ago
1. Use lock instead of stop sign 2. Help the user understand what they can edit
I'm agree that we use just lock and unlocked button instead of having the stop sign. I've made some changes to the locked and unlocked state to fix the ux issue.
3. Use popovers more effectively
5. Warn user about the consequences of making manual edits.
6. Inform user no more pairwise ranking can be done for a category
7. Help the user differentiate between the levels
I didn't understand the last one!
7. Help the user differentiate between the levels
@mosaeedi the colors of these rows perhaps could be slightly different to more clearly communicate the three levels to the user.
Oh, I got it.
I think it's better to reduce the opacity rather than change colors.
Background opacity on levels: Level 1: 100% Level 2: 70% Level 3: 50%
We need to figure out a better word than rankings... it doesn't sound right
For now i would say:
"Rank more projects in this category to unlock."
Use lock instead of stop sign
Even though we internally differentiate between something being locked or disabled, that distinction don't matter to the end user. The result is still that row cannot be edited. I propose we keep using the lock symbol for disabled rows as well, not the stop sign.
Help the user understand what they can edit
Currently the locked rows look almost more prominent than the active ones. Make sure locked rows look toned down / disabled and that the active ones stand out.
Use popovers more effectively.
Signal "Invalid value" more clearly.
Warn user about the consequences of making manual edits.
Inform user no more pairwise ranking can be done for a category
Help the user differentiate between the levels