GenericMappingTools / agu24workshop

Mastering Geospatial Visualizations with GMT/PyGMT pre-conference workshop at AGU24
https://www.generic-mapping-tools.org/agu24workshop/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
11 stars 3 forks source link

Tutorial 4 - Geophysics (Seismology): Ideas and basic concept #6

Open yvonnefroehlich opened 1 month ago

yvonnefroehlich commented 1 month ago

Within the pre-workshop we plan to have a tutorial covering topics regarding geophysics / seismology (see Tutorial 4 in the schedule table at https://hackmd.io/JtJP8TyNQBiEUNGHZwfhhg#Schedule). This issue should help to bundel ideas for topics and the basic structure before starting to work on a JN in PR to avoid double work 🙂. Feel free to edit this issue and add your own ideas :rocket:.

Creator / presenter

Possible topics

jhtong33 commented 1 month ago

I think "seismic anisotropy" might not be simple for non-seismologists.

I have some ideas:

  1. profile, seismicity, and focal mechanisms (maybe Mw>6)
  2. relative plate motion(velo) ?
  3. lithosphere thickness (xyz2grd/grdimage/grdcontour) https://ds.iris.edu/ds/products/emc-cam2016/
  4. geology(faults and volcanos)
Esteban82 commented 1 month ago

I think it is better NOT to explain about focal mechanisms. It is a specific module just for that. For those who are not interested, it will not bring them anything. For those who are interested, I think they can learn it on their own. It is a simple module. I would mention that it exists.

yvonnefroehlich commented 3 weeks ago

I think "seismic anisotropy" might not be simple for non-seismologists.

I think it is better NOT to explain about focal mechanisms. It is a specific module just for that. For those who are not interested, it will not bring them anything. For those who are interested, I think they can learn it on their own. It is a simple module. I would mention that it exists.

Yeah, probably you are right, focal mechanisms and seismic anisotropy are specifically related to seismology.

yvonnefroehlich commented 3 weeks ago

For a more general set up we could do something in the direction of:

Maybe we can have an “Additional task” section at the end of the tutorial with suggestions for further adjustments and give some links to additional resources or examples:

jhtong33 commented 3 weeks ago

In my first-figure tutorial, I have already cover grdimage, makecpt, and colorbar. I think xyz2grd, grdcontour, grdtrack will be great direction. Since we have 45 minutes, perhaps we can add simple earthquake profile and basic beachball. (see also https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14745-8/figures/1)

yvonnefroehlich commented 3 weeks ago

In my first-figure tutorial, I have already cover grdimage, makecpt, and colorbar.

Ah, nice. And this is actually good, so we can save some time. Then we focus on grdcontour in this tutorial and we do not need to spend much time on explaining makecpt and colorbar again.

yvonnefroehlich commented 2 weeks ago

I think xyz2grd, grdcontour, grdtrack will be great direction. Since we have 45 minutes, perhaps we can add simple earthquake profile and basic beachball. (see also https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14745-8/figures/1)

As we now have a general idea of what we want to teach in this tutorial, I think we can start creating the tutorial. Regarding adding details, I think the easiest way is to (more or less) finish the "xyz2grd, grdcontour, grdtrack" part; and based on how much time we have left we can extend the tutorial regarding more features (seismicity, beachballs, etc.). What is the best way to work on this tutorial as a team? I think one of us can just start and open a PR with a rough draft and then we go through this and give suggestions and add ideas.

Update: I submitted PR # 8 with a rough set up of the JN. Feel free to add suggestions for code and docs 🙂.