Open PaulWessel opened 2 years ago
Sound good!! I agree that psrose
could be upgrade.
A few questions:
Linking @GenericMappingTools/pygmt-maintainers into the conversation, since this would likely lead to a PyGMT deprecation as well.
It is true that rose has a few options specific to polar histogram and of course those letters are already taken for other things in histogram. I will go through all options and see what collisions we end up.
I don't think deprecating psrose
, even if leaving it crawling in the underground, is a good idea. People would start (and keep) asking what happened to it. Better just leave it as is and adding a big deprecation in the man page (but not necessarily in the binary).
To be discussed I think. We could even have a redirecting psrose page that explains why and gives the link to pshistogram. for instance.
The binning radially is also a desirable feature for Cartesian histograms, we will do that for both types.
Description of the desired feature
The psrose module is very old (2.4.1) and has a checkered history:
It is too late to fix the way psrose works. I propose this solution to address all the wrong things in psrose as well as enable future features:
Accepting comments from @GenericMappingTools/core.