Closed KeranLi closed 3 months ago
š Thanks for opening your first issue here! Please make sure you filled out the template with as much detail as possible. You might also want to take a look at our contributing guidelines and code of conduct.
It should be 03m
, not 03m*
.
Well, it works! Thanks a lot! The table in docs is confusing.
At the top of the table, it says "An asterisk denotes tiled datasets", but I agree that it's a little misleading.
Transferring this issue report to https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/remote-datasets
Perhaps we should have another column (after the size
column) to state if a grid is tiled or not? @PaulWessel @Esteban82 Thoughts?
At the top of the table, it says "An asterisk denotes tiled datasets", but I agree that it's a little misleading.
Transferring this issue report to https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/remote-datasets
Sorry, I did not notice this.
Perhaps we should have another column (after the
size
column) to state if a grid is tiled or not? @PaulWessel @Esteban82 Thoughts?
I agree - this is a better solution.
Still, I think what it says now is kind of OK. But then again, I'm the one who wanted the asterisk to indicate tiled datasets. "Clear as mud".
I guess to help people who cannot read it would be simpler to have a separate column. I guess I am not sure what this information will do for people other than confuse? We implemented this system so it would be transparent and even things like @earth_relief by itself works. Who needs the under-the-hood technical stuff which can be explained in the repo readme?
My personal reason for doing this was to - well - simply have a fast way to check if a dataset was tiled or not. (Remembering which are tiled, and which are not, is not an option). When designing a map, I didnt want to use tiled datasets.
I guess I am not sure what this information will do for people other than confuse?
It's useful for the PyGMT team when we provide functions to load the dataset into xarray.DataArray object. Otherwise, we have to go to the data server and check if a grid is stored in a single file or in a directory.
OK, fine with me as long as I dont have to do this! :-)
I can to it. Keep as is or make new column?
Hm. From a technical perspective, the table is fine as is, as the *
is explained in the caption. But, I feel it can be misleading in different ways. When looking at this table for the first time before reading the documentation, I interpreted the *
as a wildcard. So probably a separate column would be clearer.
So something like this?
So something like this?
Yes, I feel a / this separate column makes it easier / clearer for new users.
Yes, agree. I'll edit the others and make them like the none above.
Sorry, I clearly prefer a x over a /. That's how it is used in math.
I'm lost. What does /
and x
mean?
From what I understood, Yvonne was proposing to replace 360 x 180
by 360/180
. But maybe it was me-misunderstanding triggered by the word columns
Oh, I am very sorry for the confusion caused š! Here, the /
means simply or
:
Yes, I feel a or this separate column makes it easier or clearer for new users.
Sorry, I clearly prefer a x over a /. That's how it is used in math.
I am totaly fine with x š.
No proposal to replace WxH with W/H, just adding the tiled/no tiled comments for reasons I dont fully understand but I dont care that much.
OK, but than (because without an example I'm still lost) what's best (and shorter) than what Andreas showed us above? Just Yes or No in that last column.
I don't understand the need either, but table looks better for example as support to explain why you don't want to do a gmtwhich
on a tilled dataset.
Maybe better to add a paragraph on the details page and explain why there are tiled and untiled versions of things?
Maybe better to add a paragraph on the details page and explain why there are tiled and untiled versions of things?
This page already explains why we do tiles:
To improve responsiveness, the larger files (i.e., currently for node spacings 05m and smaller) have been split into smaller tiles.
You're right. All the things anyone who want or need to know is there. Not sure if we need that table column just because some rookie got confused. Maybe the original sin was to ad the asterisk to try to explain which was tiled even though the whole point of tiling and reassembly under the hood was so users should not need to know anything about this.
Perhaps we can remove the asterisk, add a note about which resolutions are tiled below the table and link to this page (https://docs.generic-mapping-tools.org/dev/datasets/remote-data.html) for reasons why we have tiled and untiled grids.
Yes, I think it's a good idea.
@anbj Are you still willing to work on this issue?
@seisman Sure. A bit busy now, but I can do it when time permits.
So for each dataset, 1)remove asterisk, 2)add a note which resolutions are tiled and 3) link to remote-data.html?
Yes, also need to remove the "An asterisk denotes tiled datasets" note above tables.
Closed by #120.
Description of the problem
Hello guys! When I use
grid = pygmt.datasets.load_earth_relief(resolution="06m", region=[70, 140, 0, 55])
to set a map of map, I found the provided resolution code can not be used.Minimal Complete Verifiable Example
Full error message
System information