codecov[bot]
commented
6 days ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
| Files with missing lines | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/woo_publications/accounts/managers.py | 100.00% <ø> (+25.00%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/woo_publications/accounts/views/csrf.py | 100.00% <ø> (+42.85%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/woo_publications/logging/logevent.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (+2.63%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/woo_publications/setup.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (+24.00%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/woo_publications/utils/checks.py | 100.00% <ø> (+10.34%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/woo_publications/utils/context_processors.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (+28.57%) |
:arrow_up: |
| ...c/woo_publications/utils/django_two_factor_auth.py | 100.00% <ø> (+33.33%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/woo_publications/utils/mixins.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (+14.28%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/woo_publications/utils/views.py | 100.00% <ø> (+28.57%) |
:arrow_up: |
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes
🚨 Try these New Features:
- Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
- JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles
This is proven code bootstrapped from default-project (let's hope these aren't famous last words) that don't ship with tests out of the box.
There are talks of putting these utilities into a separate utility package and have them tested there, and make default-project pull in this dependency so that we don't have to repeat this coverage workaround for every project that we start, but that's not helping us in the short term.