Lucas Ho Individual Video

[Gennalynb123]

https://watch.screencastify.com/v/lc0gTIaadbBYTxhhmRw7

[Gennalynb123]

Grade (CB Gennalyn): 6/6; three topics discussed, including program design and purpose, collaboration, and data abstraction; relationship with college board explained; technicals shown; video within time limits (2:43)

Comments (3 positive, 1 suggestion) -well organized video -well thought out and explained -clear connections made to college board -maybe put more emphasize on the "why" aspect of the project when talking about program design and purpose

[the1jun]

Peer Graded by Jun: 6/6. All requirements were met: a total of three topics were addressed, which were program design and purpose, collaboration, and data abstraction. Tied successfully into the information presented by College Board (in the form of notes) and various examples/tangibles were shown. The video was between the given time range.

Comments:

• I liked your explanation of the program design; if I were objective and had not seen the questions before, I would have been able to fully comprehend the format and layout that was executed.
• It was good that you pulled up notes to keep your video concise. It was formulaically well done; you would first show the notes, which explained the topic/concept, then you would show the actual example that we embedded in our code. I really liked how you organized it in this way.
• You did a really commendable job making connections into the tangibles of your code. I specifically liked your Logic Gate example, which was very thorough and easy to understand for somebody who had not worked on the logic gates part of the lab like me.
• You could have improved on the Collaboration aspect: showing the README with the various commits that we each have done over the past weeks of CSP would have served to fully exemplify the collaboration that we have done as a group.

[suneelanaidu]

You explained code for data abstraction well. Color Codes was you had to show mini-lab/CB learning applied to PBL or other features of PBL. You did not show any progress/contribution to the PBL. Add your technical work to the project for N@TM.

• No comments/score from Ali, Rithwik