Closed only1chunts closed 3 years ago
Looks like the two terms could be merged. Lynn
Seems same, we could harmonize the definitions
Use existing terms, but use label from food package (air particulate matter concentration) which is neutral to whether or not you are breathing it.
We are NOT creating the new term MIXS:0001112 for the food package, instead, we will update the existing terms and use that.
Term ID - MIXS:0000108
Term name - respirable particulate matter
Structured comment name - resp_part_matter
Definition - Concentration of substances that remain suspended in the air, and comprise mixtures of organic and inorganic substances (PM10 and PM2.5); can report multiple PM's by entering numeric values preceded by name of PM
Expected value - particulate matter name;measurement value
Value syntax - {text};{float} {unit}
Example - PM2.5;10 microgram per cubic meter
Preferred unit - microgram per cubic meter
Package(s) - Air, Food
updated to :
Term name - air particulate matter concentration
Structured comment name - air_PM_concen
Confirmed in MIxS v6 Term Updates sheet and included in v6 update log
Proposed term details The following term is proposed in the Food package:
Suggested update(s) There is already an existing term that is very similar:
Additional context Are these terms the same? if so we do not need the new one (air_PM_concen) in the food packages
This term is proposed in the 147 new terms ticket #201