Closed cmungall closed 9 months ago
Here is a link to the technical documentation:
This paper is is more detailed that one above:
a couple of years ago I created a MIGS template in the CEDAR workbench: https://openview.metadatacenter.org/templates/https:%2F%2Frepo.metadatacenter.org%2Ftemplates%2F2be33bb9-ff4e-45f0-920d-b37110673bf6 Not sure how complete it was, or if it is actually correct and useful, but it might be a reasonable starting point to fork from?! Never really worked out how to do anything with the template though?
I think that's a useful starting point. Has anyone examined the json-schema that is generated from this?
I only have access to the read-only view of the template :(
I couldn't workout how to share the template in Cedar, but I did copy and paste the JSON of it to a text file here for you to look at. migs-template-cedar.json.txt
I think there is still potential value in this, so I will keep it open for MIxS 7
I vote for closing this - it would be easy to add something generic at the LinkML level
We are using LinkML, so closing.
Note this ticket is not about evaluating CEDAR tooling, but rather the abstract data model and associated JSON-LD / RDF / JSON Schema representation.
High level description here:
https://github.com/metadatacenter/cedar-docs/wiki/CEDAR-Template,-Element,-and-Field-Instances
e.g JSON-LD/RDF for a template with two fields here:
Note that fields can be constrained to be value sets from ontologies:
The paper is here: https://more.metadatacenter.org/sites/default/files/An%20Open%20Repository%20Model%20for%20Acquiring%20Knowledge%20about%20Scientific%20Experiments.pdf
The abstract data model is in fig 1:
More docs and guides here:
https://github.com/metadatacenter/cedar-docs/wiki/CEDAR-technical-documentation