"In general PostGIS may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions
of the GNU General Public License, either version 2 or (at your option) any
later version. Please refer to the COPYING file for details."
Can this be removed to avoid further confusion for legal people doing license evaluations for FOSS libraries?
Why geolatte-geom source bundle (e.g. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/geolatte/geolatte-geom/1.8.2/geolatte-geom-1.8.2-sources.jar) has PostGIS licensing related file /spatial_ref_sys_license? This is causing confusion in legal evaluations as it looks like this geolatte-geom library has PostGIS embedded as it's GPL license is mentioned:
"In general PostGIS may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the GNU General Public License, either version 2 or (at your option) any later version. Please refer to the COPYING file for details."
Can this be removed to avoid further confusion for legal people doing license evaluations for FOSS libraries?