Closed gclitheroe closed 7 years ago
I have noticed that the current stationXML used for beta returns sites that have no sensor installed. Such as SR057 and sites that have creation dates in the future. @quiffman @ozym we need to have a bit of a discussion around what we should include in the stationXML.
Yes, the current StationXML reflects what's in the delta repo and needs cleaning both in the repo and in the selections used for the FDSN service.
<q:quakeml xmlns:q="http://quakeml.org/xmlns/quakeml/1.2" xmlns="http://quakeml.org/xmlns/bed/1.2">
<script/>
<eventParameters publicID="smi:nz.org.geonet/NA">
<event publicID="smi:nz.org.geonet/1553545">
<amplitude publicID="smi:nz.org.geonet/111963">
<type>AML</type>
<genericAmplitude>
<value>0.032000</value>
</genericAmplitude>
<timeWindow>
<reference>1971-04-15T00:37:26.790Z</reference>
<begin>0</begin>
<end>0</end>
</timeWindow>
<unit>m</unit>
<waveformID stationCode="TUA" networkCode="NZ"/>
<evaluationMode>manual</evaluationMode>
<comment>
<text>timing uncertain</text>
</comment>
</amplitude>
...
<pick publicID="smi:nz.org.geonet/153174">
<time>
<value>1971-04-15T00:38:31.600Z</value>
<lowerUncertainty>0.1</lowerUncertainty>
<upperUncertainty>0.25</upperUncertainty>
</time>
<waveformID stationCode="MNG" networkCode="NZ"/>
<onset>impulsive</onset>
<phaseHint>P</phaseHint>
<polarity>positive</polarity>
<evaluationMode>manual</evaluationMode>
<evaluationStatus>confirmed</evaluationStatus>
</pick>
...
These QuakeML picks and magnitues have no waveforms associated with them, but equally they also have no station locations associated with them in the QuakeML itself.
I've switched fdsn-ws over to use the station xml file geonet-meta/stationxml/complete.xml
I've deployed the version of FDSN ws that includes the station service.
This is temporary and needs moving and automating as the delta and archive process shakes out.