Closed wilkoquak closed 1 year ago
Table 2 states:
interface — for backwards-compatibility to UML 1 schemas (that comply with earlier versions of ISO 19103:2015) also: type
Indeed, though, <<type>>
is maybe something to avoid in our examples. Then again, that is part of the larger discussion about the use of UML profiles and UML version in the specification.
Table 2 lists the relevant stereotypes but the
<<type>>
stereotype that is used in Figure 11 is not mentioned.