search

George-Hookway / PBjammy

Learning to use PBjam
0 stars 0 forks source link

EPIC 212617037 (Jon) #11

Open George-Hookway opened 1 month ago

George-Hookway commented 1 month ago

212617037 - 14 - MS - Echelle 212617037 - 14 - MS - Mode ID 212617037 - 14 - MS - Peakbagged Echelle 212617037 - 14 - MS - Peakbagging

@nielsenmb @grd349

George-Hookway commented 1 month ago

Keystone numax is ~880, which looks slightly low. Though if I'm right in thinking that lower frequency modes are harder to observe, this should be expected.

grd349 commented 1 month ago

Let's talk about this one.

nielsenmb commented 1 month ago

numax for F-stars is harder since the envelope is usually wide and flat, so I'm not surprised if there are differences in numax. This is one where we might have to rely on the epsilon_p value to say whether or not the mode ID is correct. I can't really see any clear distinction between the modes in the spectrum, and the scatter in the samples in the echelles is too large to tell there as well.

George-Hookway commented 1 month ago

PBjam used an epsilon of 0.75, and the rough model I made suggests 0.90. I was thinking that these values are close enough for it to be believed, as it would have to be off my ~0.5 for there to be a concern.

nielsenmb commented 1 month ago

That sounds fine to me then, dnu looks good, numax looks good, so it's probably a good mode ID then.