search

George-Hookway / PBjammy

Learning to use PBjam
0 stars 0 forks source link

EPIC 211506655 (Abi) #89

Closed George-Hookway closed 1 week ago

George-Hookway commented 4 weeks ago

211506655 - 8 - SG - Echelle 211506655 - 8 - SG - Mode ID 211506655 - 8 - SG - Peakbagged Echelle 211506655 - 8 - SG - Peakbagging

@nielsenmb @grd349

George-Hookway commented 4 weeks ago

Since this seems to be a red giant, is it worth re-running with the RGB model?

nielsenmb commented 4 weeks ago

I would definitely be interested in seeing the result!

I think the final peakbag plot also need some tweaking.

grd349 commented 4 weeks ago

Doesn't look too bad to me but I'll defer to Martin.

George-Hookway commented 3 weeks ago

211506655 - 9 - RGB - Echelle 211506655 - 9 - RGB - Mode ID 211506655 - 9 - RGB - Peakbagged Echelle 211506655 - 9 - RGB - Peakbagging

George-Hookway commented 3 weeks ago

I re-ran as a red giant and the results are largely the same.

When removing systematics, one of the l=0 modes was removed, and PBjam's placed an l=1 there instead. Since we know there should be a peak there, would it be wise to just leave that systematic in, especially since it's power would be small compared to the actually mode at this SNR?

grd349 commented 3 weeks ago

This is amazing!

nielsenmb commented 3 weeks ago

Very nice! Amazed it worked so well with the RG model.

George-Hookway commented 2 weeks ago

211506655 - 8 - SG - Echelle 211506655 - 8 - SG - Mode ID 211506655 - 8 - SG - Peakbagged Echelle 211506655 - 8 - SG - Peakbagging

George-Hookway commented 2 weeks ago

This is with the sub-giant model. The SG model seems to provide slightly better Mode IDs, so I've used it instead, since this star is on the boundary.

grd349 commented 2 weeks ago

Awesome!

nielsenmb commented 1 week ago

Looks alright to me.

Looks like we need those l=3 modes though :)