Closed BatchelorJ closed 3 years ago
@BatchelorJ thanks for this. I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I think we should follow the standard names - as frustrating as they are. See my comment in test_transform.py
Thanks @harry093, I thought I'd throw this code up to see what we thought about it so thanks for the feedback. I'm happy to stick to the rule of years <2000 using 2-digit suffixes while >=2000 using 4-digit suffixes as long as it's consistently applied. Most in the geodetic and survey community understand this convention so we should be able to get away with it.
This PR standardizes the naming of transformation definitions in the constants module (resolves #129) and adds reverse transformations utilizing the same naming convention (resolves #127). Several other modules and tests that use some of these transformation objects have been refactored, and the names of functions that convert GDA2020 <-> ATRF2014 have been changed so that they have different names to the transformation objects themselves.