GeoscienceAustralia / eqrm

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/eqrm
Other
5 stars 4 forks source link

running a single scenario or multiple scenarios is giving different results. #103

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Running a single scenario or multiple scenarios is giving different results.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
compare the current\TS_fat02 SA results between;
python implementation_tests/scenarios/TS_fat02.py
  and;
python check_scenarios.py

Original issue reported on code.google.com by duncan.g...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2012 at 4:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Likely to be due to different random numbers being used.

Original comment by duncan.g...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2012 at 4:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
one sim java_bedrock_SA_rp[1000pt0].txt
% Return period = 1000
% First row are rsa periods - subsequent rows are sites
1.0
0.04315269743
0.04884786839
0.1677719674
0.04911851977
0.03386256304
0.07341120759
0.0616300987
0.06767777729
0.1011443867
0.07417443579
0.06744310506
0.06133322394
0.04467914005
0.06327383962

when all scenarios are run;
 Return period = 1000
% First row are rsa periods - subsequent rows are sites
1.0
0.06098728133
0.06104828881
0.06109922391
0.06114003086
0.06117055699
0.0611907899
0.06120068281
0.06120020795
0.06118935749
0.06116814388
0.06113658732
0.0610946914
0.06082556929
0.0607333893

Original comment by duncan.g...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2012 at 4:17