Some accepted proposals are listed as informal

[AntonErtl]

https://forth-standard.org/proposals/reword-the-term-execution-token-#reply-742 and https://forth-standard.org/proposals/traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions#reply-487 are accepted but listed among the informal proposals in the sorting on https://forth-standard.org/proposals and are not listed on https://forth-standard.org/contributions/markdown/proposal/accepted

Similarly, https://forth-standard.org/proposals/place-place#reply-745 is sorted among the informal proposals and not listed in the CfV markdown list.

Finally, https://forth-standard.org/proposals/specify-that-0-throw-pops-the-0#reply-886 is sorted among the informal proposals and there is no markdown list for formal proposals.

[GeraldWodni]

The issue with [157][https://forth-standard.org/proposals/reword-the-term-execution-token-#reply-742) and 153 seem to have been resolved. I believe you looked at it when I updated the Database but not the corresponding SQL Query in the front-end.

206(place-place) has been fixed just now in 59be46c9084eb73ad99f4d210f1db4ee9df6a9dc

finally 213(specify-that-0-throw-pops-the-0) also seems to work now.

Thanks for reporting, please reopen if i missed something.