Geralddtan / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Wrong explanation in UG for view #3

Open Geralddtan opened 2 years ago

Geralddtan commented 2 years ago

In the example listed, "view 2 will display all contacts assigned to the 1st task in the task list.". This is flawed as view 2 should list contacts assigned to the 2nd task in the list. I am putting this as a high severity because this is a potentially very confusing logical bug.

image.png

nus-pe-bot commented 2 years ago

Team's Response

This is a typo, defined as VeryLow. The TASKINDEX is required to be the index of the task as specified clearly in the description of the command above.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow] Originally [severity.High]

Reason for disagreement: A "typo" would refer to issues such as missing the word "the" or misspelling a word. In this case, this is a typo that is of high stakes. Imagine a law document which should be "the user is not allowed to..." but instead was "the user is allowed to...". This is a typo but one can definitely agree that it is high stakes as its implications are bigger than a mere typo like a spelling error.

In this case, "view 2" assigning the "1st" task could pose to be extremely confusing to the user. Even though it was stated that the "task index" refers to the index of the task, a user would rightfully be confused by directly contradictory information.

Thus, I believe and would like to change the severity to "MEDIUM" because view is a very vital method in the use case of searching for people assigned to a task.