Closed acouch closed 7 years ago
A response from Pantheon:
The operations seems to be arranged properly, but the memory expense of particular operations may be the issue. I would say that it should certainly be broken up as there are several cache flush operations happening within the
dkan_additional_setup
.
@acouch I clicked on the link the error page and it took me here:
after that the installation is successful.
I've updated the docs. The "DKAN final setup tasks" are already fairly broken up but I'll see if we can go further.
Seems to be working now. Closing.
I get the following when installing DKAN on Pantheon at the last step:
I'm not sure what could be done about this other than breaking up the final install into more discreet steps. It would be not to time consuming to test this. I create a ticket on Pantheon to ask for guidance: https://dashboard.pantheon.io/users/e92fe87e-f95d-4853-b66d-11cee3514864#support/ticket/60142
Another step could be to supply a default database like some other profiles do. This would make the pantheon installation a lot quicker as well as make it faster for our internal systems as well.
The installation is successful after that step. So at the least I think this should get documented as an expected behavior: http://docs.getdkan.com/dkan-documentation/get-dkan/dkan-pantheon