Open dafeder opened 5 years ago
@dafeder: should i add this to the data dictionaries epic or no?
@dafeder is this still a planned ticket?
Need to follow up with the Frictionless project about combining dcat-us and data package standards...
Update - this is still something I'd like to see added, along with a general pattern for mapping the core storage schema -- which is likely to be something DCAT-like -- to an arbitrary second schema to help integrate catalogs with wider ecosystems. This might look like
So we could ship with a data package mapping but it would only be guaranteed to work with the default schema; it would need to be straightforward to extend/alter the mapping if you override the default schemas.
This is an old issue but I think worth keeping open; we are likely to be doing related work in the next few months that may unblock this.
Having a datapackage.json endpoint for every dataset, especially as we integrate Data Dictionaries at the resource level using the tabular data schema, will open up a universe of tooling that exists for this standard (including easy integration with Good Tables)).