Closed frankcarey closed 7 years ago
Would there be a better way to do handle this without losing the ability for dkan_dataset and recline to be standalone modules? Otherwise the items from the make file from recline for example would need to be updated in two places.
We talked and agreed on @frankcarey 's plan.
Several modules were consolidated into core and the make file simplified https://github.com/NuCivic/dkan/pull/1387
There are way too many make files that are bing used to create dkan. Worse is that the dkan make file include sub makefiles, which can in turn include sub make files.
Similar issue with data_starter
Related Issues / PR